Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 39507/11   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2015,37597
EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 39507/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,37597)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29.09.2015 - 39507/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,37597)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29. September 2015 - 39507/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,37597)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,37597) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 40756/06

    VLAD AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 39507/11
    The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Abramiuc v. Romania, no. 37411/02, §§ 103-109, 24 February 2009 and Vlad and others v. Romania, nos. 40756/06, 41508/07 and 50806/07, §§ 133 and 154-156, 26 November 2013).
  • EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03

    SULWINSKA v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 39507/11
    To this end, the Court will carefully examine the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007).
  • EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 37411/02

    ABRAMIUC c. ROUMANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 39507/11
    The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Abramiuc v. Romania, no. 37411/02, §§ 103-109, 24 February 2009 and Vlad and others v. Romania, nos. 40756/06, 41508/07 and 50806/07, §§ 133 and 154-156, 26 November 2013).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

    FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 39507/11
    The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Abramiuc v. Romania, no. 37411/02, §§ 103-109, 24 February 2009 and Vlad and others v. Romania, nos. 40756/06, 41508/07 and 50806/07, §§ 133 and 154-156, 26 November 2013).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht