Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 63158/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,37607) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PERHÁCS v. SLOVAKIA
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 56195/00
KRUMPEL AND KRUMPELOVA v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 63158/14
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Pavlík v. Slovakia, no. 74827/01, §§ 109-111, 30 January 2007 or Krumpel and Krumpelová v. Slovakia, no. 56195/00, §§ 50-51, 5 July 2005). - EGMR, 30.01.2007 - 74827/01
PAVLIK v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 63158/14
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Pavlík v. Slovakia, no. 74827/01, §§ 109-111, 30 January 2007 or Krumpel and Krumpelová v. Slovakia, no. 56195/00, §§ 50-51, 5 July 2005). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 63158/14
To this end, the Court has examined the declaration carefully in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 63158/14
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Pavlík v. Slovakia, no. 74827/01, §§ 109-111, 30 January 2007 or Krumpel and Krumpelová v. Slovakia, no. 56195/00, §§ 50-51, 5 July 2005).