Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  A.L. (X.W.) v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (China);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture ...

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 02.03.2010 - 61498/08

  AL-SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2015 - 44095/14

  The Court reiterates its general principles as set out in the case of Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom (no. 61498/08, ECHR 2010):.

• EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 60367/08

  Khamtokhu und Aksenchik ./. Russland: Lebenslange Freiheitsstrafe nur für Männer …

  In 2009 the Constitutional Court imposed an indefinite moratorium on capital punishment in Russia (for the text of the decision, see A.L. (X.W.) v. Russia, no. 44095/14, § 51, 29 October 2015).

  The territories encompassed by the member States of the Council of Europe have become a zone free of capital punishment and the Court has accepted that exposing an applicant to a real risk of being sentenced to death and executed elsewhere may give rise to an issue under Article 3 of the Convention (see Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, §§ 102-104, Series A no. 161; Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, §§ 115-18 and 140-43, ECHR 2010; and A.L. (X.W.) v. Russia, no. 44095/14, §§ 63-66, 29 October 2015).

• EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 33050/18

  GHAZARYAN AND BAYRAMYAN v. AZERBAIJAN

  Lastly, a system of regular monitoring of the prisoner's physical and mental condition should also be put in place in order to ensure that the solitary confinement measures remain appropriate in the circumstances (see, for example, A.L. (X.W.) v. Russia, no. 44095/14, § 76, 29 October 2015, with further references to Ramishvili and Kokhreidze v. Georgia, no. 1704/06, § 83, 27 January 2009; Onoufriou v. Cyprus, no. 24407/04, §§ 70 and 71, 7 January 2010; and Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no. 59450/00, § 139, ECHR 2006-IX).
• EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 16473/19

  F.T. AND RAKHMANOV v. RUSSIA

  25079/19 and 18570/19, § 35, 6 April 2021; also, by contrast, A.L. (X.W.) v. Russia, no. 44095/14, § 65, 29 October 2015).
• EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 50236/06

  SHATOKHIN v. RUSSIA

  In order to avoid any risk of arbitrariness resulting from a decision to place a prisoner in solitary confinement, the decision must be accompanied by procedural safeguards guaranteeing the prisoner's welfare and the proportionality of the measure (see Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no. 59450/00, § 139, ECHR 2006-IX; Onoufriou, cited above, § 70; and A.L. (X.W.) v. Russia, no. 44095/14, § 76, 29 October 2015).
• EGMR - 82352/17 (anhängig)

  KOROSTELEV AND PULYALIN v. RUSSIA

  Have there been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the applicants" solitary confinement in remand prison no. 1 in Syktyvkar, the Komi Republic (see A.L. (X.W.) v. Russia, no. 44095/14, §§ 74-82, 29 October 2015; Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, §§ 76-81, 6 March 2014; and Borodin v. Russia, no. 41867/04, § 129, 6 November 2012)?.