Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NURI KURT v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Art. 8 No violation of P1-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 12.06.2003 - 37038/97
• EGMR, 29.11.2005 - 37038/97

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 25760/94

  IPEK c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2005 - 37038/97

  This being so, it is to be pointed out that both the European Commission of Human Rights and the Court have previously embarked on fact finding missions in similar cases from Turkey where the State security forces were allegedly the perpetrators of the unlawful destruction of property (see, among many others, the above cited judgments of Akdivar and Others and Yöyler; Ä°pek v. Turkey, no. 25760/94, ECHR 2004-... (extracts)).
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2005 - 37038/97

  That said, the Court reiterates that, notwithstanding the terms of Article 13 read literally, the existence of an actual breach of another provision is not a prerequisite for the application of the Article (Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52).
• EGMR, 13.06.1994 - 10588/83

  BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN (ARTICLE 50)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2005 - 37038/97

  The Court reiterates that there must be a causal connection between the damage claimed by the applicant and the violation of the Convention, and that this may, in an appropriate case, include compensation in respect of loss of earnings (see amongst others, the Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain (Article 50), judgment of 13 June 1994, Series A no. 285-C, pp.

• EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 10486/10

  YOH-EKALE MWANJE c. BELGIQUE

  Ce constat de non-violation ne signifie pourtant pas que les griefs tirés des articles 2 et 3 échappent à l'empire de l'article 13 (voir, mutatis mutandis Nuri Kurt c. Turquie, no 37038/97, §§ 116-117, 29 novembre 2005).
• EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 27081/13

  SOW c. BELGIQUE

  Ce constat de non-violation ne signifie pourtant pas que le grief tiré de l'article 3 échappe à l'empire de l'article 13 (voir, mutatis mutandis, Nuri Kurt c. Turquie, no 37038/97, §§ 116-117, 29 novembre 2005, et Yoh-Ekale Mwanje, précité, § 103).
• EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 51933/08

  MURDALOVY v. RUSSIA

  A complaint may be regarded as arguable when it is not prima facie untenable and warrants an examination on the merits by the appropriate national authorities (see Çelik and Imret v. Turkey, no. 44093/98, § 57, 26 October 2004; Nuri Kurt v. Turkey, no. 37038/97, § 117, 29 November 2005; and Singh and Others v. Belgium, no. 33210/11, § 84, 2 October 2012).