Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NANKOV v. \

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 30.10.1998 - 28616/95

  STYRANOWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 26541/02

  In assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after that date, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on 10 April 1997 (see Milosevic v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 15056/02, § 21, 20 April 2006; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; and Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 26541/02

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 20.04.2006 - 15056/02

  MILOSEVIC v.

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 26541/02

  In assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after that date, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on 10 April 1997 (see Milosevic v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 15056/02, § 21, 20 April 2006; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; and Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 10.12.1982 - 7604/76

  FOTI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 26541/02

  In assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after that date, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on 10 April 1997 (see Milosevic v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 15056/02, § 21, 20 April 2006; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; and Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 26541/02

  It cannot therefore be accepted that the discontinuance of prosecution because of the time-bar constituted any acknowledgment, whether explicit or implicit, on the part of the national authorities that the applicant's case had not been heard within a reasonable time (see, mutatis mutandis, Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66).

• EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 23152/05

  NASTESKA v.

  In this context, it reiterates that, since the remittal of cases for re-examination is usually ordered as a result of errors committed by lower courts, the repetition of such orders within one set of proceedings discloses a serious deficiency in the judicial system (see Nankov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 26541/02, § 48, 29 November 2007).
• EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 21790/03

  SANDEL v.

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see Nankov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 26541/02, § 45, 29 November 2007).