Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 66446/01   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2007,59598
EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 66446/01 (https://dejure.org/2007,59598)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29.11.2007 - 66446/01 (https://dejure.org/2007,59598)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29. November 2007 - 66446/01 (https://dejure.org/2007,59598)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,59598) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung




Kontextvorschau:





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (8)  

  • EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 80104/13

    TRIPCOVICI v. MONTENEGRO

    In the circumstances of the present case, the Court finds that the first applicant has standing to proceed in the second applicant's stead (see, mutatis mutandis, Göktas v. Turkey, no. 66446/01, § 19, 29 November 2007).
  • EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 24280/09

    BUYUKKOL v. TURKEY

    It reiterates that it is not a court of fourth instance and it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I; Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 49, ECHR 2001-II; and Göktas v. Turkey, no. 66446/01, §§ 32-34, 29 November 2007).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2010 - 1520/06

    OSMAN ERDEN v. TURKEY

    The Court recalls that it has found a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in a number of cases that raise similar issues to those arising here (see, mutatis mutandis, ErtuÄ?rul Kılıç v. Turkey, no. 38667/02, 12 December 2006, and Göktas v. Turkey, no. 66446/01, § 41, 29 November 2007).
  • EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 43569/08

    TOYAKSI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    There is no element which might lead it to conclude that the domestic courts acted in an arbitrary or unreasonable manner in establishing the facts or interpreting the domestic law (see Göktas v. Turkey, no. 66446/01, §§ 32-34, 29 November 2007).
  • EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 27577/04

    SENTÜRK v. TURKEY

    The Court further recalls that it has in the past examined cases against Turkey in which the authorities delayed paying compensation awarded under Law no. 466, without any interest (see ErtuÄ?rul Kılıç v. Turkey, no. 38667/02, §§ 19-21, 12 December 2006, and Göktas v. Turkey, no. 66446/01, §§ 37-41, 29 November 2007).
  • EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 4236/03

    BALABAN v. TURKEY

    It finds no reason to depart from that conclusion in the present case since the Government have failed to demonstrate that the applicant and/or his legal representative were duly notified of the dates of the court's hearings which were held on 20 August 2002 and 24 December 2002, in order to ensure their attendance (see, a contrario, Göktas v. Turkey, no. 66446/01, § 23, 29 November 2007).
  • EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 74022/01

    DJAVAKHADZE v. RUSSIA

    The domestic courts are best placed for assessing the relevance of evidence to the issues in the case (see, amongst many authorities, Gurepka v. Ukraine, no. 61406/00, § 45, 6 September 2005 and Göktas v. Turkey, no. 66446/01, § 32, 29 November 2007).
  • EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 11326/03

    MEHMET ALI KACAR v. TURKEY

    The domestic courts are best placed for assessing the relevance of evidence to the issues in the case and for interpreting and applying rules of substantive and procedural law (see, amongst many authorities, Gurepka v. Ukraine, no. 61406/00, § 45, 6 September 2005 and Göktas v. Turkey, no. 66446/01, § 32, 29 November 2007).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht