Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.11.2011 - 15994/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,51679) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BEKERMAN v. LIECHTENSTEIN
Art. 6, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly struck out of the list Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2011 - 15994/10
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Liechtenstein, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, §§ 43 et seq., ECHR 2000-VII; Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, §§ 128 et seq., ECHR 2006-VII; and von Hoffen v. Liechtenstein, no. 5010/04, §§ 47 et seq., 27 July 2006). - EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01
Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2011 - 15994/10
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Liechtenstein, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, §§ 43 et seq., ECHR 2000-VII; Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, §§ 128 et seq., ECHR 2006-VII; and von Hoffen v. Liechtenstein, no. 5010/04, §§ 47 et seq., 27 July 2006). - EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 5010/04
VON HOFFEN v. LIECHTENSTEIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2011 - 15994/10
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Liechtenstein, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, §§ 43 et seq., ECHR 2000-VII; Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, §§ 128 et seq., ECHR 2006-VII; and von Hoffen v. Liechtenstein, no. 5010/04, §§ 47 et seq., 27 July 2006). - EGMR, 13.05.2008 - 34909/04
P. G. gegen Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2011 - 15994/10
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law (see, in particular, Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary issue) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; and also Spólka z o.o. WAZA v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Genth v. Germany (dec.), no. 34909/04, 13 May 2008).