Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.11.2011 - 51542/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,51681) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
JAKUBISIAK v. POLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly struck out of the list Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2011 - 51542/09
The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial proceedings, in particular the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act, are set out in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V, and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII and in its judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V.In his regard, the Court recalls that it has already found that the 2004 Act provides for an effective remedy in respect of the excessive length of proceedings (see Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V; Figiel v. Poland (no. 1), no. 38190/05, §§ 25-30, 17 July 2008; Figiel v. Poland (no. 2), no. 38206/05, §§ 29-34, 16 September 2008).
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2011 - 51542/09
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; and Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, §§ 38-41, 11 October 2005). - EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99
MAJEWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2011 - 51542/09
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; and Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, §§ 38-41, 11 October 2005).
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2011 - 51542/09
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI); WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 38190/05
FIGIEL v. POLAND (No. 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2011 - 51542/09
In his regard, the Court recalls that it has already found that the 2004 Act provides for an effective remedy in respect of the excessive length of proceedings (see Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V; Figiel v. Poland (no. 1), no. 38190/05, §§ 25-30, 17 July 2008; Figiel v. Poland (no. 2), no. 38206/05, §§ 29-34, 16 September 2008). - EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 38206/05
FIGIEL v. POLAND (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2011 - 51542/09
In his regard, the Court recalls that it has already found that the 2004 Act provides for an effective remedy in respect of the excessive length of proceedings (see Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V; Figiel v. Poland (no. 1), no. 38190/05, §§ 25-30, 17 July 2008; Figiel v. Poland (no. 2), no. 38206/05, §§ 29-34, 16 September 2008).