Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BOCZON v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 71152/01

  BARSZCZ v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2007 - 66079/01

  For a detailed presentation of the relevant domestic law concerning the available remedies against excessive length of proceedings, see Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005; Barszcz v. Poland, no. 71152/01, 30 May 2006, §§ 26-35.

  The Court notes that the arguments raised by the Government are the same as those already examined and rejected by the Court in previous cases against Poland (see Malasiewicz v. Poland, no. 22072/02, §§ 32-34, 14 October 2003; Ratajczyk v. Poland, (dec.), 11215/02, 31 May 2005; Barszcz v. Poland, no. 71152/01, 30 May 2006) and that the Government have not submitted any new circumstances which would lead the Court to depart from its previous findings.

• EGMR, 09.12.2015 - 30210/96

  KUDLA ET 204 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2007 - 66079/01

  For a detailed presentation of the relevant domestic law concerning the available remedies against excessive length of proceedings, see Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005; Barszcz v. Poland, no. 71152/01, 30 May 2006, §§ 26-35.

  The Court notes that the arguments raised by the Government are the same as those already examined and rejected by the Court in previous cases against Poland (see Malasiewicz v. Poland, no. 22072/02, §§ 32-34, 14 October 2003; Ratajczyk v. Poland, (dec.), 11215/02, 31 May 2005; Barszcz v. Poland, no. 71152/01, 30 May 2006) and that the Government have not submitted any new circumstances which would lead the Court to depart from its previous findings.

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2007 - 66079/01

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, § 45, 13 July 2004).

 
• EGMR, 11.10.2001 - 38073/97

  H.T. v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2007 - 66079/01

  The Court reiterates that special diligence is required in pension disputes (see, inter alia, H.T. v. Germany, no. 38073/97, § 37, 11 October 2001).
• EGMR, 13.07.2004 - 66096/01

  ZYNGER v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2007 - 66079/01

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, § 45, 13 July 2004).
• EGMR, 08.12.1983 - 7984/77

  PRETTO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2007 - 66079/01

  With regard to the conduct of the authorities and of the applicant, the Court reiterates that only delays attributable to the State may justify a finding of a failure to comply with the "reasonable time" requirement (see, among other authorities, Proszak v. Poland, judgment of 16 December 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII, § 40) and that in civil proceedings the parties too must show "due diligence" (see the Pretto and Others v. Italy judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 71, pp. 14-15, § 33).

• EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 18393/09

  PANJU c. BELGIQUE

  La Cour rappelle que les requérants peuvent user de toutes les voies procédurales pertinentes qu'offre le droit interne et notamment solliciter la cessation des poursuites pour cause de délais excessifs mais qu'ils doivent agir avec diligence et supporter les conséquences si ces démarches provoquent des retards (voir notamment Boczon c. Pologne, no 66079/01, § 51, 30 janvier 2007, et McFarlane, précité, § 148).
• EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 22510/13

  MCNAMARA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  However, there may also be situations where no such damage, or only minimal damage, has been ascertained - for instance where an applicant's conduct has entirely or partly caused the procrastination or where the delay has been caused by circumstances independent from the authorities (see Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 204, ECHR 2006-V; Proszak v. Poland, 16 December 1997, § 40, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII, with further references; Rylski v. Poland, no. 24706/02, § 76, 4 July 2006; Boczon v. Poland, no. 66079/01, § 51, 30 January 2007, and Piper v. the United Kingdom, no. 44547/10, §§ 56-69 and 73-74, 21 April 2015).