Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.03.1999 - 39973/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1999,33976) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
J.C.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.1999 - 39973/98
The Court's task under the Convention is not to give a ruling as to whether evidence was properly admitted, but rather to ascertain whether the proceedings as a whole, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (cf. Eur. Court HR, Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, p. 32, § 33; Saïdi v. France judgment of 20 September 1993, Series A no. 261-C, p. 56, § 43; and Van Mechelen and Others judgment, loc.cit., § 50). - EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.1999 - 39973/98
As to the question whether or not the domestic courts correctly held that the customs officers acted in accordance with their powers under domestic law, the Court considers that it is not competent to examine alleged errors of fact or law committed by national courts, except where it finds that such errors might have involved a possible violation of the rights and freedoms set forth in the Convention (cf. Eur. Court HR. Schenk v. Switzerland judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, § 45).