Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 18837/06   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,64012
EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 18837/06 (https://dejure.org/2010,64012)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30.03.2010 - 18837/06 (https://dejure.org/2010,64012)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30. März 2010 - 18837/06 (https://dejure.org/2010,64012)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,64012) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 17977/91

    KAMPANIS v. GREECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 18837/06
    The possibility for a detainee to be heard either in person or through some form of representation features among the fundamental guarantees of procedure applied in matters of deprivation of liberty (see Kampanis v. Greece, judgment of 13 July 1995, Series A no. 318-B, § 47).

    The case-law makes clear that, in order to comply with that paragraph, proceedings to extend a person's detention on remand or to review a decision ordering the person's detention or refusing bail must be adversarial in nature and must ensure equality of arms between the parties: in this regard, the Court has held that the possibility for a detainee to be heard in person or through some form of representation features among the fundamental guarantees of procedure applied in matters of deprivation of liberty (see, for example, Kampanis v. Greece, judgment of 13 July 1995, Series A no. 318-B, § 47).

  • EGMR, 11.07.2000 - 25792/94

    TRZASKA v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 18837/06
    In the case of a person whose detention falls within the ambit of Article 5 § 1 (c), a hearing is required (see Trzaska v. Poland, no. 25792/94, § 74, 11 July 2000).
  • EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 67175/01

    REINPRECHT c. AUTRICHE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 18837/06
    Although it is not always necessary that the procedure under Article 5 § 4 be attended by the same guarantees as those required under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention for criminal or civil litigation, it must have a judicial character and provide guarantees appropriate to the kind of deprivation of liberty in question (see Reinprecht v. Austria, no. 67175/01, § 31, ECHR 2005-...., with further references).
  • EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 543/03

    McKAY c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 18837/06
    The Court recalls its judgment in McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 36 - 40, ECHR 2006-X. There, after a thorough examination of the relevant case-law, the Grand Chamber stated that it had found no persuasive authority for concluding that the first obligatory appearance before a judge must encompass the power to grant release on bail.
  • EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

    IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 18837/06
    "According to the Court's case-law, it follows from the wording of Article 6 - and particularly from the autonomous meaning to be given to the notion of "criminal charge" - that this provision has some application to pre-trial proceedings (see the Imbrioscia v. Switzerland judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, p. 13, § 36).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht