Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.03.2017 - 16287/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,8274) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GRAMMOSENIS AND OTHERS v. GREECE
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
GRAMMOSENIS ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
Art. 3 MRK
[FRA]
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (9)
- EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 34979/97
WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2017 - 16287/13
The Court reiterates that in contrast to an objection of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, which must be raised by a respondent Government, it cannot set aside the application of the six-month rule solely because the Government concerned have not made a preliminary objection to that effect (see Maltabar and Maltabar v. Russia, no. 6954/02, § 80, 29 January 2009; Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I; and Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 68, ECHR 2006-III). - EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2017 - 16287/13
A period of an applicant's detention should be regarded as a "continuing situation" as long as the detention has been effected in the same type of detention facility in substantially similar conditions (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 78, 10 January 2012). - EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 21447/03
PREDESCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 72286/01
MELNIK v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2017 - 16287/13
However, even in such cases, the applicant's intention to mislead the Court must always be established with sufficient certainty (see, mutatis mutandis, Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 58-60, 28 March 2006, and Nold v. Germany, no. 27250/02, § 87, 29 June 2006). - EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 27250/02
Menschrechtskonvention: Überlange Verfahrensdauer, Zivilrechtsstreit
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2017 - 16287/13
However, even in such cases, the applicant's intention to mislead the Court must always be established with sufficient certainty (see, mutatis mutandis, Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 58-60, 28 March 2006, and Nold v. Germany, no. 27250/02, § 87, 29 June 2006). - EGMR, 29.01.2009 - 6954/02
MALTABAR AND MALTABAR v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2017 - 16287/13
The Court reiterates that in contrast to an objection of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, which must be raised by a respondent Government, it cannot set aside the application of the six-month rule solely because the Government concerned have not made a preliminary objection to that effect (see Maltabar and Maltabar v. Russia, no. 6954/02, § 80, 29 January 2009; Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I; and Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 68, ECHR 2006-III). - EGMR, 25.09.2007 - 42165/02
HADRABOVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2017 - 16287/13
42165/02 and 466/03, 25 September 2007, and Predescu v. Romania, no. 21447/03, §§ 25-27, 2 December 2008). - EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 31365/96
VARBANOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2017 - 16287/13
The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as an abuse of the right of application if it was knowingly based on untrue facts with the intention of misleading the Court (see Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X). - EGMR, 24.09.2002 - 27824/95
POSTI AND RAHKO v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2017 - 16287/13
The Court reiterates that the concept of a "continuing situation" refers to a state of affairs in which there are continuous activities by or on the part of the State which render the applicant a victim (see Posti and Rahko v. Finland, no. 27824/95, § 39, ECHR 2002-VII).
- EGMR, 28.02.2019 - 19951/16
Herabsetzende Behandlung junger Flüchtlinge: Griechenland verurteilt
Ainsi, des durées de détention comprises entre un et trois mois ont été considérées comme contraires à l'article 3 (Siasios et autres, précité, § 32, Vafiadis, précité, §§ 35-36, Shuvaev, précité, § 39, Tabesh, précité, § 43, Efremidze, précité, § 41, Aslanis, précité, § 39, Chazaryan c. Grèce, no 76951/12, 16 juillet 2015, Peidis c. Grèce, no 728/13, 16 juillet 2015, Ali et autres c. Grèce, no 13385/14, §§ 15-20, 7 avril 2016, Grammosenis et autres c. Grèce, no 16287/13, §§ 48-50, 30 mars 2017, Iatropoulos et autres c. Grèce, no 23262/13, §§ 37-41, 20 avril 2017, et S.Z. c. Grèce, no 66702/13, §§ 38-42, 21 juin 2018). - EGMR, 13.06.2019 - 14165/16
SH.D. ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE, AUTRICHE, CROATIE, HONGRIE, MACÉDOINE DU NORD, SERBIE …
Ainsi, des durées de détention comprises entre un et trois mois ont été considérées comme contraires à l'article 3 (Siasios et autres, précité, § 32, Vafiadis, précité, §§ 35-36, Shuvaev, précité, § 39, Tabesh, précité, § 43, Efremidze, précité, § 41, Aslanis, précité, § 39, Chazaryan c. Grèce, no 76951/12, 16 juillet 2015, Peidis c. Grèce, no 728/13, 16 juillet 2015, Ali et autres c. Grèce, no 13385/14, §§ 15-20, 7 avril 2016, Grammosenis et autres c. Grèce, no 16287/13, §§ 48-50, 30 mars 2017, Iatropoulos et autres c. Grèce, no 23262/13, §§ 37-41, 20 avril 2017, et S.Z. c. Grèce, no 66702/13, §§ 38-42, 21 juin 2018).