Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  THOMPSON v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  THOMPSON v. RUSSIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 60092/12

  Z.J. v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2021 - 36048/17

  It follows from these considerations that the Court's task is not to substitute itself for the domestic authorities in the exercise of their responsibilities regarding child custody and access issues, but rather to review, in the light of the Convention, the decisions taken by those authorities in the exercise of their power of appreciation (see Sahin v. Germany [GC], no. 30943/96, § 64, ECHR 2003-VIII; Sommerfeld v. Germany [GC], no. 31871/96, § 62, ECHR 2003-VIII (extracts); C. v. Finland, no. 18249/02, § 52, 9 May 2006; and Z.J. v. Lithuania, no. 60092/12, § 96, 29 April 2014).
• EGMR, 30.01.2018 - 51323/14

  EDINA TÓTH v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2021 - 36048/17

  The Court notes that a parent and child's mutual enjoyment of each other's company constitutes a fundamental element of "family life" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention (see Edina Tóth v. Hungary, no. 51323/14, § 49, 30 January 2018).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2021 - 36048/17

  "Respect" for family life implies an obligation for a State to act in a manner calculated to allow these ties to develop normally (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 221, ECHR 2000-VIII).

• EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 19664/20

  VERHOEVEN c. FRANCE

  [8] Pour une critique de la Convention de La Haye qui aborde, hors du contexte de la violence domestique, la question de la situation de vulnérabilité dans laquelle se trouvent les femmes, voir l'opinion dissidente du juge Dedov jointe à l'arrêt Thompson c. Russie (no 36048/17, 30 mars 2021), avec les références qui y sont citées.
• EGMR, 08.06.2023 - 44684/14

  P.N. c. RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE

  En cas d'illicéité, elle impose l'obligation de retourner l'enfant (voir, entre autres, Thompson c. Russie, no 36048/17, §§ 59-60, 30 mars 2021).
• EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 29601/20

  C.-A.D. AND L.-C.D. v. RUSSIA

  This approach was tantamount to a finding by the domestic courts that the option of returning very young children who have been abducted by their mothers is not necessarily envisaged under the Hague Convention, a conclusion that is contrary to the letter and spirit of that Convention (see Thompson v. Russia, no. 36048/17, §§ 54-74, 30 March 2021, with further references).
• EGMR, 03.05.2022 - 30560/19

  P.D. v. RUSSIA

  That action nevertheless placed the respondent State under a positive obligation to secure for the applicant his right to respect for his family life, which included taking measures under the Hague Convention with a view to ensuring his prompt reunification with his child (see Thompson v. Russia, no. 36048/17, §§ 55-56, 30 March 2021, and G.N. v. Poland, no. 2171/14, §§ 47-48, 19 July 2016).
• EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 54628/19

  VELASCO AYRA v. RUSSIA

  This approach was tantamount to a finding by the domestic courts that the option of returning very young children who have been abducted by their mothers is not necessarily envisaged under the Hague Convention, a conclusion that is contrary to the letter and spirit of that Convention (see Thompson v. Russia, no. 36048/17, §§ 54-74, 30 March 2021).