Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 30.04.2015 - 63053/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,8973) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MISYUKEVICH c. RUSSIE
Art. 6, Art. 6+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
Violation de l'article 6+6-3-c - Droit à un procès équitable (Article 6 - Procédure pénale Article 6-1 - Procès équitable) (Article 6-3-c - Se défendre avec l'assistance d'un défenseur Article 6 - Droit à un procès équitable) ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MISYUKEVICH v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 6+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 10.08.2006 - 54784/00
PADALOV c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2015 - 63053/09
The Court reiterates that under Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention an accused is entitled to have a lawyer assigned by the court of its own motion "when the interests of justice so require" (see Vaudelle v. France, no. 35683/97, § 59, ECHR 2001-I, and Padalov v. Bulgaria, no. 54784/00, §§ 54 and 55, 10 August 2006). - EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 26260/02
GOLUBEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2015 - 63053/09
The Court also observes that the exercise of the right to legal assistance takes on particular significance where the applicant communicates with the courtroom by video link (see Grigoryevskikh, cited above, § 92; Shulepov, cited above, § 35; Golubev v. Russia (dec.), no. 26260/02, 9 November 2006; and Marcello Viola v. Italy, no. 45106/04, ECHR 2006-XI (extracts)). - EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2015 - 63053/09
Even if the method of calculation employed by the Russian authorities in respect of the conditions-of-detention complaints did not correspond exactly to the guidelines established by the Court in the pilot judgment (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012), what is important is that the proposed sum is not unreasonable in comparison with the awards made by the Court in similar cases (see Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, § 105, ECHR 2006-V). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2015 - 63053/09
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles established in its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03).