Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.04.2015 - 66436/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,8975) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CUNHA MARTINS DA SILVA COUTO c. PORTUGAL
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation de l'article 6 - Droit à un procès équitable (Article 6 - Procédure civile Article 6-1 - Délai raisonnable) (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CUNHA MARTINS DA SILVA COUTO v. PORTUGAL
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 30.04.2015 - 66436/12
- EGMR, 21.09.2016 - 66436/12
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92
HOKKANEN v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2015 - 66436/12
The Court further reiterates that child custody cases must be dealt with speedily (see Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, § 72, Series A no. 299-A; Niederböster v. Germany, no. 39547/98, § 39, ECHR 2003-IV), all the more so where the passage of time may have irreversible consequences for the parent-child relationship (see Tsikakis v. Germany, no. 1521/06, §§ 64 and 68, 10 February 2011) - likewise, cases concerning parental responsibility and contact rights call for particular expedition (see Paulsen-Medalen and Svensson v. Sweden, 19 February 1998, § 39, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I ; Laino v. Italy [GC], no. 33158/96, § 22, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2015 - 66436/12
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).