Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 19845/15, 55109/15, 75275/16 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30. April 2019 - 19845/15, 55109/15, 75275/16 (https://dejure.org/2019,13507)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,13507) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GATCINAS v. LITHUANIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
GATCINAS v. LITHUANIA and 2 other applications
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 62543/00
GORRAIZ LIZARRAGA ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 19845/15
According to the Court's established case-law, the concept of "victim" must be interpreted autonomously and irrespective of domestic concepts such as those concerning an interest or capacity to act (see Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 35, ECHR 2004-III). - EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 39438/13
NAZARENKO v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 19845/15
The Government referred to the Court's case-law where it held that although, as a rule, cohabitation might be a requirement for such a relationship, other factors might exceptionally also serve to demonstrate that a relationship had sufficient constancy to create de facto family ties (see Nazarenko v. Russia, no. 39438/13, § 56, ECHR 2015 (extracts)), including the length of the relationship and whether the couple had demonstrated their commitment to each other (see Z.H. and R.H. v. Switzerland, no. 60119/12, § 42, 8 December 2015). - EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 60119/12
Z.H. AND R.H. v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 19845/15
The Government referred to the Court's case-law where it held that although, as a rule, cohabitation might be a requirement for such a relationship, other factors might exceptionally also serve to demonstrate that a relationship had sufficient constancy to create de facto family ties (see Nazarenko v. Russia, no. 39438/13, § 56, ECHR 2015 (extracts)), including the length of the relationship and whether the couple had demonstrated their commitment to each other (see Z.H. and R.H. v. Switzerland, no. 60119/12, § 42, 8 December 2015).