Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.05.2000 - 46502/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2000,43192) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SHULMIN v. RUSSIA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 30.05.2000 - 46502/99
- EGMR, 20.05.2003 - 46502/99
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 25.10.1990 - 11787/85
THYNNE, WILSON AND GUNNELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2000 - 46502/99
The Court recalls that where a sentence of imprisonment is imposed after "conviction by a competent court", the supervision required by Article 5 § 4 is incorporated in the decision of the court (see the Thynne, Wilson and Gunnell v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 October 1990, Series A no. 190-A, p. 27, § 68, with reference back to the De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp judgment of 18 June 1971 (Series A no. 12, pp. 40, § 76)). - EGMR, 28.03.1990 - 11968/86
B. ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2000 - 46502/99
The fact that the sentence of imprisonment was not a final sentence, as the applicant's appeal was still pending, is not relevant as, once the applicant had been convicted, the "cause" of his detention lay in the conviction at first instance (see the B. v. Austria judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 175, p. 15, § 39).