Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MARTIN v. ESTONIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3-c - Legal assistance of his own choosing) No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Martin v. Estonia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 35985/09
• EGMR, 09.11.2016 - 35985/09

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 35985/09

  The right not to incriminate oneself, in particular, presupposes that the prosecution in a criminal case seek to prove their case against the accused without resorting to evidence obtained through methods of coercion or oppression in defiance of the will of the accused (see Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 100, ECHR 2006-IX, with further references).
• EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 4378/02

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (heimliche Ermittlungsmethoden; Umgehungsverbot; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 35985/09

  They also contribute to the prevention of miscarriages of justice and to the fulfilment of the aims of Article 6, notably equality of arms between the investigating or prosecuting authorities and the accused (see Salduz, cited above, § 53; Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 92, with further references; Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025/04, § 68, 24 September 2009; and Leonid Lazarenko, cited above, § 51).
• EGMR, 24.09.2009 - 7025/04

  PISHCHALNIKOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 35985/09

  They also contribute to the prevention of miscarriages of justice and to the fulfilment of the aims of Article 6, notably equality of arms between the investigating or prosecuting authorities and the accused (see Salduz, cited above, § 53; Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 92, with further references; Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025/04, § 68, 24 September 2009; and Leonid Lazarenko, cited above, § 51).

 
• EGMR, 15.12.2011 - 26766/05

  Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Zeugen (Recht auf ein faires Verfahren: …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 35985/09

  In addition, the Court's primary concern under Article 6 § 1 is to evaluate the overall fairness of the criminal proceedings (see, mutatis mutandis, Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011, and Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926/05, § 84, ECHR 2010, both with further references).
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 35985/09

  Such a requirement would lead to a situation incompatible with the aim and object of the Convention (see OÄ?ur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 98, ECHR 1999-III, and De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium (Article 50), 10 March 1972, § 16, Series A no. 14).
• EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 14032/88

  POITRIMOL c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 35985/09

  The Court further reiterates that although not absolute, the right of everyone charged with a criminal offence to be effectively defended by a lawyer, assigned officially if need be, is one of the fundamental features of a fair trial (see Salduz, cited above, § 51; Demebukov v. Bulgaria, no. 68020/01, § 50, 28 February 2008; and Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, § 34, Series A no. 277-A).
• EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

  IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 35985/09

  Thus, Article 6 - especially paragraph 3 - may be relevant before a case is sent for trial if and in so far as the fairness of the trial is likely to be seriously prejudiced by an initial failure to comply with its provisions (see Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, § 50, ECHR 2008; Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, § 131, ECHR 2005-IV; and Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 36, Series A no. 275).
• EGMR, 25.09.1992 - 13611/88

  Klaus Croissant

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 35985/09

  While it is true that the right to be defended by counsel of one's own choosing is not an absolute one and the defendant's wishes can be overridden when there are relevant and sufficient grounds for holding this necessary in the interests of justice (see Croissant v. Germany, 25 September 1992, § 29, Series A no. 237-B), the Court notes that in the present case, even if Mr Järve's presumed conflict of interests would have served as grounds for replacing him, no use was made of the formal procedure for removal of counsel applicable in the event of a conflict of interests and provided for in Articles 54 and 55 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (see paragraph 53 above).
• EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

  SCHENK c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 35985/09

  While Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national legislation and the domestic courts (see, amongst others, Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, §§ 45-46, Series A no. 140, and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24724/94

  Mord an James Bulger

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 35985/09

  In its case-law on Article 6 the Court has held that when criminal charges are brought against a child, it is essential that he be dealt with in a manner which takes full account of his age, level of maturity and intellectual and emotional capacities, and that steps are taken to promote his ability to understand and participate in the proceedings (see Panovits v. Cyprus, no. 4268/04, § 67, 11 December 2008, and T. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24724/94, 16 December 1999, § 84).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 22.02.2024 - C-603/22

  M.S. u.a. (Droits procéduraux d'une personne mineure) - Vorlage zur …

  31 EGMR, 30. Mai 2013, Martin/Estland (CE:ECHR:2013:0530JUD003598509, § 90), und 20. Oktober 2015, Dvorski/Kroatien (CE:ECHR:2013:1128JUD002570311, § 78).