Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  IBRAGIMOV v. SLOVAKIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 21.02.2012 - 65916/10
• EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 65916/10
• EGMR - 65916/10 (anhängig)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 48514/06

  GASAYEV c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 65916/10

  Mr Gesayev, for his part, had an application before the Court against Spain (no. 48514/06), which was declared inadmissible on 17 February 2009.

  In any event, relying on the Court's decision in Gasayev v. Spain (no. 48514/06, 17 February 2009) and judgment in the case of Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia (no. 36378/02, ECHR 2005-III), the respondent Government were of the view that there was no support for the applicant's claim that he would be mistreated in the Russian Federation.

• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 65916/10

  In so far as any liability under the Convention is or may be incurred, it is liability incurred by the extraditing Contracting State by reason of its having taken action which has as a direct consequence the exposure of an individual to proscribed ill-treatment (see Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, §§ 90-91, Series A no. 161).

  The Court has earlier admitted that an issue might exceptionally be raised under Article 6 by an extradition decision in circumstances where the fugitive suffered or risked suffering a flagrant denial of a fair trial in the requesting country (see, for example, Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 121, Series A no. 161; Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, §§ 90-91, ECHR 2005-I; or Othman (Abu Qatada), cited above, § 258).

• EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 54131/10

  Asyl, Widerruf, Achtung des Familienlebens, Refoulement, subsidiärer Schutz, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 65916/10

  The Court has also taken into account reports by the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe (see, for example, Bajsultanov v. Austria, no. 54131/10, §§ 38-42, 12 June 2012; and I v. Sweden, no. 61204/09, §§ 27-31, 5 September 2013).

 
• EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87

  VILVARAJAH ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 65916/10

  In cases such as the present, the Court must examine the foreseeable consequences of the applicant being extradited to the requesting country, bearing in mind the general situation there and his personal circumstances (see Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, § 108 in fine, Series A no. 215).
• EGMR, 20.03.1991 - 15576/89

  CRUZ VARAS ET AUTRES c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 65916/10

  In determining whether it has been shown that the applicant runs a real risk, if extradited, of suffering treatment proscribed by Article 3, the Court will assess the issue in the light of all the material placed before it, or, if necessary, material obtained proprio motu (see Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden, 20 March 1991, § 75, Series A no. 201).
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 65916/10

  For similar reasons, it may not be considered "arguable" for the purposes of Article 13 of the Convention (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52).
• EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 25904/07

  Sri Lanka, Tamilen, Europäischer Menschenrechtsgerichtshof, menschenrechtswidrige …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 65916/10

  The right to political asylum is also not contained in either the Convention or its Protocols (see, for example, NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904/07, § 109, 17 July 2008, with further references).
• EGMR, 21.11.2000 - 53652/00

  RAF v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 65916/10

  Moreover, the right not to be extradited, as such, is not one of the rights and freedoms recognised by the Convention and its Protocols (see Raf v. Spain (partial dec.), no. 53652/00, ECHR 2000-XI (extracts)).