Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 15327/05, 20340/06, 20656/06, 24790/06, 40560/06, 44142/06, 47042/06, 1552/07, 21737/07, 32235/07, 3241/08, 23393/08, 28616/08, 42258/08, 15595/09, 42138/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 15327/05, 20340/06, 20656/06, 24790/06, 40560/06, 44142/06, 47042/06, 1552/07, 21737/07, 32235/07, 3241/08, 23393/08, 28616/08, 42258/08, 15595/09, 42138/09 (https://dejure.org/2016,32444)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30.06.2016 - 15327/05, 20340/06, 20656/06, 24790/06, 40560/06, 44142/06, 47042/06, 1552/07, 21737/07, 32235/07, 3241/08, 23393/08, 28616/08, 42258/08, 15595/09, 42138/09 (https://dejure.org/2016,32444)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30. Juni 2016 - 15327/05, 20340/06, 20656/06, 24790/06, 40560/06, 44142/06, 47042/06, 1552/07, 21737/07, 32235/07, 3241/08, 23393/08, 28616/08, 42258/08, 15595/09, 42138/09 (https://dejure.org/2016,32444)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,32444) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (10)
- EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 17/02
LIGERES v. LATVIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 15327/05
In particular, the Court notes that having regard to the overall length of the proceeding, the relevant complexity of the cases, the applicants" conduct and that of the authorities, including the diligence they displayed while dealing with the cases, and the levels of jurisdiction involved, the length of the proceedings was not excessive and met the "reasonable time" requirement (see, among other authorities, Nikitin v. Russia (dec.), no. 50178/99, ECHR 13/11/2003; Stukalova v. Russia (dec.), no. 58292/00, ECHR 19/10/2004; Zenevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 4567/02, ECHR 06/07/2006; Mironov v. Russia (dec.), no. 22625/02, ECHR 05/10/2006; Kupreyanov v. Russia (dec.), no. 21158/05, ECHR 12/02/2009; Lyakhevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 26704/02, ECHR 12/11/2013; Burmistrova v. Russia (dec.), no. 887/06, ECHR 17/02/2015).17/02/1978.
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 26704/02
LYAKHEVICH v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 15327/05
In particular, the Court notes that having regard to the overall length of the proceeding, the relevant complexity of the cases, the applicants" conduct and that of the authorities, including the diligence they displayed while dealing with the cases, and the levels of jurisdiction involved, the length of the proceedings was not excessive and met the "reasonable time" requirement (see, among other authorities, Nikitin v. Russia (dec.), no. 50178/99, ECHR 13/11/2003; Stukalova v. Russia (dec.), no. 58292/00, ECHR 19/10/2004; Zenevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 4567/02, ECHR 06/07/2006; Mironov v. Russia (dec.), no. 22625/02, ECHR 05/10/2006; Kupreyanov v. Russia (dec.), no. 21158/05, ECHR 12/02/2009; Lyakhevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 26704/02, ECHR 12/11/2013; Burmistrova v. Russia (dec.), no. 887/06, ECHR 17/02/2015). - EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 58292/00
STUKALOVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 15327/05
In particular, the Court notes that having regard to the overall length of the proceeding, the relevant complexity of the cases, the applicants" conduct and that of the authorities, including the diligence they displayed while dealing with the cases, and the levels of jurisdiction involved, the length of the proceedings was not excessive and met the "reasonable time" requirement (see, among other authorities, Nikitin v. Russia (dec.), no. 50178/99, ECHR 13/11/2003; Stukalova v. Russia (dec.), no. 58292/00, ECHR 19/10/2004; Zenevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 4567/02, ECHR 06/07/2006; Mironov v. Russia (dec.), no. 22625/02, ECHR 05/10/2006; Kupreyanov v. Russia (dec.), no. 21158/05, ECHR 12/02/2009; Lyakhevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 26704/02, ECHR 12/11/2013; Burmistrova v. Russia (dec.), no. 887/06, ECHR 17/02/2015).
- EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 50178/99
NIKITINE c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 15327/05
In particular, the Court notes that having regard to the overall length of the proceeding, the relevant complexity of the cases, the applicants" conduct and that of the authorities, including the diligence they displayed while dealing with the cases, and the levels of jurisdiction involved, the length of the proceedings was not excessive and met the "reasonable time" requirement (see, among other authorities, Nikitin v. Russia (dec.), no. 50178/99, ECHR 13/11/2003; Stukalova v. Russia (dec.), no. 58292/00, ECHR 19/10/2004; Zenevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 4567/02, ECHR 06/07/2006; Mironov v. Russia (dec.), no. 22625/02, ECHR 05/10/2006; Kupreyanov v. Russia (dec.), no. 21158/05, ECHR 12/02/2009; Lyakhevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 26704/02, ECHR 12/11/2013; Burmistrova v. Russia (dec.), no. 887/06, ECHR 17/02/2015). - KAGH, 27.04.2012 - M 12/11
Änderung der Parkordnung eines Parkhauses; Zustimmung der Mitarbeitervertretung
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 15327/05
In particular, the Court notes that having regard to the overall length of the proceeding, the relevant complexity of the cases, the applicants" conduct and that of the authorities, including the diligence they displayed while dealing with the cases, and the levels of jurisdiction involved, the length of the proceedings was not excessive and met the "reasonable time" requirement (see, among other authorities, Nikitin v. Russia (dec.), no. 50178/99, ECHR 13/11/2003; Stukalova v. Russia (dec.), no. 58292/00, ECHR 19/10/2004; Zenevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 4567/02, ECHR 06/07/2006; Mironov v. Russia (dec.), no. 22625/02, ECHR 05/10/2006; Kupreyanov v. Russia (dec.), no. 21158/05, ECHR 12/02/2009; Lyakhevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 26704/02, ECHR 12/11/2013; Burmistrova v. Russia (dec.), no. 887/06, ECHR 17/02/2015). - VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 06.11.2012 - 13/11
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 15327/05
In particular, the Court notes that having regard to the overall length of the proceeding, the relevant complexity of the cases, the applicants" conduct and that of the authorities, including the diligence they displayed while dealing with the cases, and the levels of jurisdiction involved, the length of the proceedings was not excessive and met the "reasonable time" requirement (see, among other authorities, Nikitin v. Russia (dec.), no. 50178/99, ECHR 13/11/2003; Stukalova v. Russia (dec.), no. 58292/00, ECHR 19/10/2004; Zenevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 4567/02, ECHR 06/07/2006; Mironov v. Russia (dec.), no. 22625/02, ECHR 05/10/2006; Kupreyanov v. Russia (dec.), no. 21158/05, ECHR 12/02/2009; Lyakhevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 26704/02, ECHR 12/11/2013; Burmistrova v. Russia (dec.), no. 887/06, ECHR 17/02/2015). - EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72
SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 15327/05
The Court reiterates in this respect that this provision only applies to those with an arguable claim under the Convention (see Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, § 113, Series A no. 61). - EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 4567/02
ZENEVICH v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 15327/05
In particular, the Court notes that having regard to the overall length of the proceeding, the relevant complexity of the cases, the applicants" conduct and that of the authorities, including the diligence they displayed while dealing with the cases, and the levels of jurisdiction involved, the length of the proceedings was not excessive and met the "reasonable time" requirement (see, among other authorities, Nikitin v. Russia (dec.), no. 50178/99, ECHR 13/11/2003; Stukalova v. Russia (dec.), no. 58292/00, ECHR 19/10/2004; Zenevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 4567/02, ECHR 06/07/2006; Mironov v. Russia (dec.), no. 22625/02, ECHR 05/10/2006; Kupreyanov v. Russia (dec.), no. 21158/05, ECHR 12/02/2009; Lyakhevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 26704/02, ECHR 12/11/2013; Burmistrova v. Russia (dec.), no. 887/06, ECHR 17/02/2015). - EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 21158/05
KUPREYANOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 15327/05
In particular, the Court notes that having regard to the overall length of the proceeding, the relevant complexity of the cases, the applicants" conduct and that of the authorities, including the diligence they displayed while dealing with the cases, and the levels of jurisdiction involved, the length of the proceedings was not excessive and met the "reasonable time" requirement (see, among other authorities, Nikitin v. Russia (dec.), no. 50178/99, ECHR 13/11/2003; Stukalova v. Russia (dec.), no. 58292/00, ECHR 19/10/2004; Zenevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 4567/02, ECHR 06/07/2006; Mironov v. Russia (dec.), no. 22625/02, ECHR 05/10/2006; Kupreyanov v. Russia (dec.), no. 21158/05, ECHR 12/02/2009; Lyakhevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 26704/02, ECHR 12/11/2013; Burmistrova v. Russia (dec.), no. 887/06, ECHR 17/02/2015). - EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 887/06
BURMISTROVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 15327/05
In particular, the Court notes that having regard to the overall length of the proceeding, the relevant complexity of the cases, the applicants" conduct and that of the authorities, including the diligence they displayed while dealing with the cases, and the levels of jurisdiction involved, the length of the proceedings was not excessive and met the "reasonable time" requirement (see, among other authorities, Nikitin v. Russia (dec.), no. 50178/99, ECHR 13/11/2003; Stukalova v. Russia (dec.), no. 58292/00, ECHR 19/10/2004; Zenevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 4567/02, ECHR 06/07/2006; Mironov v. Russia (dec.), no. 22625/02, ECHR 05/10/2006; Kupreyanov v. Russia (dec.), no. 21158/05, ECHR 12/02/2009; Lyakhevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 26704/02, ECHR 12/11/2013; Burmistrova v. Russia (dec.), no. 887/06, ECHR 17/02/2015).
- EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 44432/06
KRUK v. RUSSIA
However, the Court has recently found that three applicants lost their status as "victims" of the alleged violation of their right to a trial within a reasonable time after the domestic courts had awarded them sums of money in the "rehabilitation" proceedings, taking into account in particular the duration of the criminal proceedings (see Khanov and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 15327/05 et al., 30 June 2016).