Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MIRCEA DUMITRESCU v. ROMANIA

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Mircea Dumitrescu v. Romania

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 22088/04

  BRAGADIREANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 14609/10

  They qualified those conditions as "an affront to human dignity" (see, in particular, Bragadireanu v. Romania, no. 22088/04, §§ 73-76, 6 December 2007; Artimenco v. Romania, no. 12535/04, §§ 22-23, 30 June 2009; and Eugen Gabriel Radu v. Romania, no. 3036/04, §§ 14-17, 13 October 2009).

  The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees and unsatisfactory sanitary conditions (see, in particular, Ciorap v. Moldova, no. 12066/02, § 70, 19 June 2007; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; Bragadireanu v. Romania, no. 22088/04, §§ 92-98, 6 December 2007; and Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, §§ 56-62, 1 June 2010).

• EGMR, 27.03.2007 - 8721/05

  ISTRATII v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 14609/10

  The Court recalls that State's obligation under Article 3 of the Convention to protect the physical well-being of persons deprived of their liberty has been interpreted as including an obligation to provide them with the requisite medical assistance (see, for instance, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI, and Istratii and Others v. Moldova, no. 8721/05, 8705/05 and 8742/05, § 49, 27 March 2007).
• EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 45705/07

  D.G. v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 14609/10

  When the authorities decide to place or keep disabled people in detention, they should demonstrate special care in guaranteeing conditions that correspond to their special needs resulting from their disability (see Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, § 30, ECHR 2001-VII; Farbtuhs v. Latvia, no. 4672/02, § 56, 2 December 2004; D.G. v. Poland, no. 45705/07, § 147, 12 February 2013; Kaprykowski v. Poland, no. 23052/05, §§ 74 and 76, 3 February 2009; and the international law sources mentioned in paragraph 51 above).

 
• EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 25867/03

  IAMANDI c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 14609/10

  The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees and unsatisfactory sanitary conditions (see, in particular, Ciorap v. Moldova, no. 12066/02, § 70, 19 June 2007; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; Bragadireanu v. Romania, no. 22088/04, §§ 92-98, 6 December 2007; and Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, §§ 56-62, 1 June 2010).
• EGMR, 19.06.2007 - 12066/02

  CIORAP v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 14609/10

  The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees and unsatisfactory sanitary conditions (see, in particular, Ciorap v. Moldova, no. 12066/02, § 70, 19 June 2007; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; Bragadireanu v. Romania, no. 22088/04, §§ 92-98, 6 December 2007; and Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, §§ 56-62, 1 June 2010).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 14609/10

  The Court recalls that State's obligation under Article 3 of the Convention to protect the physical well-being of persons deprived of their liberty has been interpreted as including an obligation to provide them with the requisite medical assistance (see, for instance, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI, and Istratii and Others v. Moldova, no. 8721/05, 8705/05 and 8742/05, § 49, 27 March 2007).
• EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 1871/08

  JELADZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 14609/10

  The authorities must also show that the necessary conditions were created for the prescribed treatment to be actually followed through (see Visloguzov v. Ukraine, no. 32362/02, § 69, 20 May 2010; Goginashvili v. Georgia, no. 47729/08, §§ 69, 70 and 80, 4 October 2011; Jashi v. Georgia, no. 10799/06, §§ 68-69, 8 January 2013; and Jeladze v. Georgia, no. 1871/08, §§ 41-42, 18 December 2012).
• EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 47729/08

  GOGINASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 14609/10

  The authorities must also show that the necessary conditions were created for the prescribed treatment to be actually followed through (see Visloguzov v. Ukraine, no. 32362/02, § 69, 20 May 2010; Goginashvili v. Georgia, no. 47729/08, §§ 69, 70 and 80, 4 October 2011; Jashi v. Georgia, no. 10799/06, §§ 68-69, 8 January 2013; and Jeladze v. Georgia, no. 1871/08, §§ 41-42, 18 December 2012).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 32842/96

  NUUTINEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 14609/10

  In this respect, the Court has held that, for parents, Article 8 includes a right that steps be taken to reunite them with their children and an obligation on the national authorities to facilitate such reunions (see, among others, Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-I; Nuutinen v. Finland, no. 32842/96, § 127, ECHR 2000-VIII; Iglesias Gil and A.U.I. v. Spain, no. 56673/00, § 49, ECHR 2003-V).
• EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

  Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 14609/10

  The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees and unsatisfactory sanitary conditions (see, in particular, Ciorap v. Moldova, no. 12066/02, § 70, 19 June 2007; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; Bragadireanu v. Romania, no. 22088/04, §§ 92-98, 6 December 2007; and Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, §§ 56-62, 1 June 2010).

• EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 72608/14

  MIHAILESCU v. ROMANIA

  Similarly, the Court has found that leaving a person with a serious physical disability to rely on his cellmates for assistance with using the toilet, bathing and getting dressed or undressed contributed to a finding that the conditions of detention amounted to degrading treatment (see Engel v. Hungary, no. 46857/06, §§ 27 and 30, 20 May 2010; Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, § 30, ECHR 2001-VII; Mircea Dumitrescu v. Romania, no. 14609/10, §§ 56-65, 30 July 2013; and Semikhvostov v. Russia, no. 2689/12, §§ 84-85, 6 February 2014).