Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.07.2020 - 10179/05, 28828/17, 28882/17, 29901/17, 18170/18, 38349/18, 39183/18, 42639/18, 46290/18, 46746/18, 49702/18, 51467/18, 51693/18, 52182/18, 52473/18, 53026/18, 58185/18, 59010/18, 1107/19, 1922/19, 2404/19, 4780/19, 4781/19, 4816/19, 5441/19, 6416/19, 673 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 30.07.2020 - 10179/05, 28828/17, 28882/17, 29901/17, 18170/18, 38349/18, 39183/18, 42639/18, 46290/18, 46746/18, 49702/18, 51467/18, 51693/18, 52182/18, 52473/18, 53026/18, 58185/18, 59010/18, 1107/19, 1922/19, 2404/19, 4780/19, 4781/19, 4816/19, 5441/19, 6416/19, 673 (https://dejure.org/2020,21068)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30.07.2020 - 10179/05, 28828/17, 28882/17, 29901/17, 18170/18, 38349/18, 39183/18, 42639/18, 46290/18, 46746/18, 49702/18, 51467/18, 51693/18, 52182/18, 52473/18, 53026/18, 58185/18, 59010/18, 1107/19, 1922/19, 2404/19, 4780/19, 4781/19, 4816/19, 5441/19, 6416/19, 673 (https://dejure.org/2020,21068)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30. Juli 2020 - 10179/05, 28828/17, 28882/17, 29901/17, 18170/18, 38349/18, 39183/18, 42639/18, 46290/18, 46746/18, 49702/18, 51467/18, 51693/18, 52182/18, 52473/18, 53026/18, 58185/18, 59010/18, 1107/19, 1922/19, 2404/19, 4780/19, 4781/19, 4816/19, 5441/19, 6416/19, 673 (https://dejure.org/2020,21068)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,21068) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DIKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 10638/08
ALEKHIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2020 - 10179/05
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in its case-law (Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), as regards placement of applicants in metal cages during hearings in court rooms; Idalov v. Russia [GC], cited above, concerning lack of speedy review of detention matters; and Alekhin v. Russia, no. 10638/08, 30 July 2009, regarding lack of, or inadequate, compensation in relation to the excessive length of pre-trial detention and to a delay in examination of an appeal against an extension order, as required by Article 5 § 5 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 5 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention).5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate, compensation in conjunction with Article 5 (1) and Article 5 (4) of the Convention - in particular, lack of compensation for unlawful arrest or detention in relation to the excessive length of pre-trial detention and to a delay in examination of an appeal against an extension order (see Alekhin v. Russia, no. 10638/08, §§ 148-155, 30 July 2009);.
- EGMR - 43441/08 (anhängig)
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2020 - 10179/05
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in its case-law (Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), as regards placement of applicants in metal cages during hearings in court rooms; Idalov v. Russia [GC], cited above, concerning lack of speedy review of detention matters; and Alekhin v. Russia, no. 10638/08, 30 July 2009, regarding lack of, or inadequate, compensation in relation to the excessive length of pre-trial detention and to a delay in examination of an appeal against an extension order, as required by Article 5 § 5 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 5 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention). - EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2020 - 10179/05
It thus considers that the applicants" complaints are admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the complaints under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).