Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.08.1990 - 9511/81 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
McCALLUM c. ROYAUME-UNI
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 13+8, Art. 13, Art. 13+3, Art. 3 MRK
Violation de l'Art. 8 Non-lieu à examiner les art. 10 13+3 et 13+8 Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
McCALLUM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 13+8, Art. 13, Art. 13+3, Art. 3 MRK
Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 10 13+3 and 13+8 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings ...
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.1990 - 9511/81
Particulars concerning the remedies listed at (a) (i) and (ii) and (b) appear in the Court's Boyle and Rice judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, at pp.In these circumstances, the Court considers that only a proportion of the costs and expenses incurred is recoverable (see, for example, the above-mentioned Boyle and Rice judgment, Series A no. 131, p. 34, para. 91).
- EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9787/82
WEEKS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.1990 - 9511/81
In particular, an exercise of discretionary power may be challenged on the grounds that the authority concerned has acted arbitrarily, in bad faith, unreasonably, for an improper purpose or otherwise outside its statutory powers (see, for example, the speech of Lord Diplock in Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service [1985] Appeal Cases 374 at 410 and [1984] 3 All England Law Reports 935 at 950-951, as quoted in the Weeks judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 114, p. 18, para. 30).