Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 61170/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,26081) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TOPTANIS v. TURKEY
Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
TOPTANIS v. TURKEY
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 43606/04
YOTOVA c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 61170/09
This obligation requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when there is reason to believe that an individual has sustained life-threatening injuries in suspicious circumstances, even where the presumed perpetrator of the fatal attack is not a State agent (see mutatis mutandis, Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, § 82, Reports 1998-IV; Yasa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, § 100, Reports 1998-VI; Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; Slimani v. France, no. 57671/00, § 47-48, ECHR 2004-IX (extracts); Pereira Henriques v. Luxembourg, no. 60255/00, § 56, 9 May 2006; and Yotova v. Bulgaria, no. 43606/04, § 68, 23 October 2012). - EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 20620/10
ERCAN BOZKURT v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 61170/09
However, the fact that he suffered a life-threatening injury resulting from the use of a potentially lethal firearm is sufficient to attract the applicability of Article 2 of the Convention (see Yasa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, § 100, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VI; Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 49-55, ECHR 2004-XI; Goncharuk v. Russia, no. 58643/00, § 74, 4 October 2007; Alkin v. Turkey, no. 75588/01, § 29, 13 October 2009; Pankov v. Bulgaria, no. 12773/03, § 49, 7 October 2010; and Bozkurt v. Turkey, no. 20620/10, § 48, 23 June 2015). - EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 12773/03
PANKOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 61170/09
However, the fact that he suffered a life-threatening injury resulting from the use of a potentially lethal firearm is sufficient to attract the applicability of Article 2 of the Convention (see Yasa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, § 100, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VI; Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 49-55, ECHR 2004-XI; Goncharuk v. Russia, no. 58643/00, § 74, 4 October 2007; Alkin v. Turkey, no. 75588/01, § 29, 13 October 2009; Pankov v. Bulgaria, no. 12773/03, § 49, 7 October 2010; and Bozkurt v. Turkey, no. 20620/10, § 48, 23 June 2015).
- EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99
MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 61170/09
This obligation requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when there is reason to believe that an individual has sustained life-threatening injuries in suspicious circumstances, even where the presumed perpetrator of the fatal attack is not a State agent (see mutatis mutandis, Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, § 82, Reports 1998-IV; Yasa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, § 100, Reports 1998-VI; Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; Slimani v. France, no. 57671/00, § 47-48, ECHR 2004-IX (extracts); Pereira Henriques v. Luxembourg, no. 60255/00, § 56, 9 May 2006; and Yotova v. Bulgaria, no. 43606/04, § 68, 23 October 2012). - EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 75588/01
ALKIN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 61170/09
However, the fact that he suffered a life-threatening injury resulting from the use of a potentially lethal firearm is sufficient to attract the applicability of Article 2 of the Convention (see Yasa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, § 100, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VI; Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 49-55, ECHR 2004-XI; Goncharuk v. Russia, no. 58643/00, § 74, 4 October 2007; Alkin v. Turkey, no. 75588/01, § 29, 13 October 2009; Pankov v. Bulgaria, no. 12773/03, § 49, 7 October 2010; and Bozkurt v. Turkey, no. 20620/10, § 48, 23 June 2015). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93
ILHAN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 61170/09
They cannot leave it to the initiative of the next of kin either to lodge a formal complaint or to take responsibility for the conduct of any investigatory procedures (see Ergi, cited above; Yasa, cited above, §§ 99 and 100; Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 63, ECHR 2000-VII; Menson and Others, cited above; Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. - EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 57671/00
SLIMANI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 61170/09
This obligation requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when there is reason to believe that an individual has sustained life-threatening injuries in suspicious circumstances, even where the presumed perpetrator of the fatal attack is not a State agent (see mutatis mutandis, Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, § 82, Reports 1998-IV; Yasa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, § 100, Reports 1998-VI; Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; Slimani v. France, no. 57671/00, § 47-48, ECHR 2004-IX (extracts); Pereira Henriques v. Luxembourg, no. 60255/00, § 56, 9 May 2006; and Yotova v. Bulgaria, no. 43606/04, § 68, 23 October 2012). - EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
- EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 34520/10
MÜFTÜOGLU ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Quoi qu'il en soit, dans deux affaires récentes, la Cour a, dans la première, appliqué de façon implicite le raisonnement selon lequel la règle en question « ne constitue aucunement un critère de recevabilité au titre de l'article 35 de la Convention'(Toptanis c. Turquie (déc.), no 61170/09, § 27, 30 août 2016), et, dans la deuxième, considéré que « l'application de [l'article 47 du règlement] relève de sa compétence exclusive concernant l'administration des procédures'(Aydogdu c. Turquie, no 40448/06, § 53, 30 août 2016).