Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.09.2014 - 54904/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,30974) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PETLYOVANYY v. UKRAINE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 73049/01
Budweiser-Streit
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2014 - 54904/08
Where a proprietary interest is in the nature of a claim, the person in whom it is vested may be regarded as having a "legitimate expectation" if there is a sufficient basis for the interest in national law, for example where there is settled case-law of the domestic courts confirming its existence (see Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, § 65, ECHR 2007-I, and Kopecký, cited above, § 52). - EGMR, 30.08.2007 - 44302/02
J.A. PYE (OXFORD) LTD ET J.A. PYE (OXFORD) LAND LTD c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2014 - 54904/08
In particular, this provision does not guarantee the right to acquire property (see J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd and J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44302/02, § 61, ECHR 2007-I, and Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, § 35, ECHR 2004-IX). - EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 28743/03
MELNITCHOUK c. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2014 - 54904/08
As regards this complaint the Court notes that it is not its task to act as a court of appeal or, as is sometimes stated, as a court of fourth instance, in respect of the decisions taken by the domestic courts (see Melnychuk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 28743/03, ECHR 2005-IX).
- EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 3958/13
ZOLOTYUK v. UKRAINE
At the same time, in a situation where the lack of a procedure governing the payment of compensation was the only obstacle to a person's otherwise clear entitlement to a particular type of compensation under the law, the Court considered that such person could be said to have a claim sufficiently established to be enforceable and could validly claim its recovery against the State (see Petlyovanyy v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 54904/08, 30 September 2014, with further references).