Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SIGAREV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention Article 5-1-c - Reasonably necessary to prevent fleeing) No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention) ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Sigarev v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 38822/97

  Recht auf Freiheit und Sicherheit (zur Wahrnehmung richterlicher Aufgaben …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.10.2014 - 53812/10

  Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria, no. 38822/97, § 66, ECHR 2003-I (extracts)).
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

  KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.10.2014 - 53812/10

  In particular, any ex post facto authorisation of pre-trial detention is incompatible with the "right to security of person" as it is necessarily tainted with arbitrariness (see, among numerous authorities, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 124 and 142, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.10.2014 - 53812/10

  Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are actual indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty laid down in Article 5 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 110 et seq., ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 33492/96

  JABLONSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.10.2014 - 53812/10

  When deciding whether a person should be released or detained, the authorities are obliged to consider alternative measures of ensuring his appearance at trial (see Jablonski v. Poland, no. 33492/96, § 83, 21 December 2000).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.10.2014 - 53812/10

  Where such grounds are "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also ascertain whether the competent national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, §§ 152 and 153, ECHR 2000-IV).

• EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 36249/14

  LISOVSKIJ v. LITHUANIA

  As a result of the repeated adjournments, there were several long periods when no hearings were held - from 3 December 2010 to 31 March 2011, from 23 June 2011 to 7 December 2011, from 15 June 2012 to 3 October 2012, from 30 November 2012 to 3 March 2013, from 26 March 2013 to 6 October 2013, and from 26 November 2013 to 16 February 2014 - amounting to a total period of more than two years without a single hearing (see paragraph 41 above; see, mutatis mutandis, Dervishi v. Croatia, no. 67341/10, § 144, 25 September 2012, and Süveges, cited above, § 101; compare and contrast Sigarev v. Russia, no. 53812/10, § 56, 30 October 2014, and Topekhin v. Russia, no. 78774/13, § 109, 10 May 2016).
• EGMR, 31.03.2022 - 26627/05

  KARIMBAYEV v. RUSSIA

  The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to inadequate conditions and lawfulness of the detention (see, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 120-66, 10 January 2012, and Sigarev v. Russia, no. 53812/10, §§ 34-42, 30 October 2014).