Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 51107/16 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,48190) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TIRIAC v. ROMANIA
No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ÈšIRIAC v. ROMANIA
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 28871/95
CONSTANTINESCU c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 51107/16
Moreover, it did not seem to accuse the applicant of any specific conduct or involvement in allegedly corrupt or unlawful actions that could have engaged his criminal liability (contrast and compare Constantinescu v. Romania, no. 28871/95, § 73, ECHR 2000-VIII, and Jalba v. Romania, no. 43912/10, § 38, 18 February 2014). - EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08
Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 51107/16
40660/08 and 60641/08, § 98, ECHR 2012). - EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 10347/10
MIKA c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 51107/16
The requirement to prove the truth of a value judgment is impossible to fulfil and infringes freedom of opinion itself, which is a fundamental part of the right secured by Article 10 (see Mika v. Greece, no. 10347/10, § 31, 19 December 2013).
- EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 84048/17
EIGIRDAS AND VĮ "DEMOKRATIJOS PLETROS FONDAS" v. LITHUANIA
Even assuming that his reputation did suffer because of that article, the Court doubts that the consequences suffered by him were sufficiently serious to override the public's interest in receiving the information contained in it (see, mutatis mutandis, Tiriac v. Romania, no. 51107/16, § 98, 30 November 2021; Stancu and Others v. Romania, no. 22953/16, § 147, 18 October 2022; Matalas v. Greece, no. 1864/18, § 58, 25 March 2021; and Balaskas, cited above, § 60). - EGMR, 05.07.2022 - 42315/15
DROUSIOTIS v. CYPRUS
The Court reiterates in this connection that even factual inaccuracies should be tolerated if published in good faith and if the expression at issue concerns controversial topics (see, mutatis mutandis, Èširiac v. Romania, no. 51107/16, § 96, 30 November 2021).