Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ROZHKOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (24)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 25.02.1993 - 10828/84

  FUNKE v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 38898/04

  The exceptions provided for in paragraph 2 of Article 8 are to be interpreted narrowly, and the need for them in a given case must be convincingly established (see Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 47, ECHR 2000-V, and Funke v. France, 25 February 1993, § 55, Series A no. 256-A).
• EGMR, 06.12.2012 - 12323/11

  MICHAUD v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 38898/04

  However, in the present case, it is not necessary to determine whether the principles concerning the legal profession and, specifically, "advocates" (see Michaud v. France, no. 12323/11, § 117, ECHR 2012) or those concerning a search of non-residential, business or similar premises should be applied.
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88

  NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 38898/04

  Depending on the context of each case, the Court has previously classified search and seizure in respect of paper documents or other similar items as interference with "private life", "correspondence" or "home" within their autonomous meanings under Article 8 of the Convention, or a combination thereof (see, among others, Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, §§ 28-33, Series A no. 251-B; and M.N. and Others v. San Marino, no. 28005/12, §§ 51-55, 7 July 2015).

 
• EGMR, 04.04.2000 - 26629/95

  WITOLD LITWA c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 38898/04

  The Convention here essentially refers back to national law and states the obligation to conform to the substantive and procedural rules thereof, but it requires in addition that any deprivation of liberty should be consistent with the purpose of Article 5, namely to protect individuals from arbitrariness (see Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629/95, §§ 72-73, ECHR 2000-III).
• EGMR, 28.08.1992 - 13704/88

  SCHWABE v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 38898/04

  That provision therefore does not justify, for example, administrative internment meant to compel a citizen to discharge his general duty of obedience to the law (see Engel and Others, cited above, § 69, and Schwabe v. Austria, 28 August 1992, § 73, Series A no. 242-B).
• EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 12954/87

  RAIMONDO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 38898/04

  The Court reiterates that Article 5 § 1 protects the physical liberty of the person (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, § 58, Series A no. 22; Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 92, Series A no. 39; and Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 39, Series A no. 281-A).
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  GUZZARDI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 38898/04

  The Court reiterates that Article 5 § 1 protects the physical liberty of the person (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, § 58, Series A no. 22; Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 92, Series A no. 39; and Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 39, Series A no. 281-A).
• EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 41604/98

  Recht auf Achtung des Privatlebens und der Wohnung (Einsatz von Durchsuchungen …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 38898/04

  The Court also reiterates that its power to review compliance with domestic law is limited, it being in the first place for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply that law (see Buck v. Germany, no. 41604/98, § 37, ECHR 2005-IV).
• EGMR, 25.02.1993 - 11471/85

  CRÉMIEUX v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 38898/04

  The Court will assess whether the reasons adduced to justify such measures were relevant and sufficient and whether the proportionality principle was adhered to (see Funke, cited above, §§ 55-57, and Crémieux v. France, 25 February 1993, §§ 36-38, Series A no. 256-B).

• EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 4815/18

  KARGASHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  7077/06 and 12 others, 26 June 2018, Rozhkov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 38898/04, §§ 91-96, 31 January 2017, Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, § 67, 13 February 2018, Kuptsov and Kuptsova v. Russia, no. 6110/03, § 81, 3 March 2011 and Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos.

  Forced attendance without evidence of proper summons to appear or of failure by the applicant to comply without a valid excuse (see Rozhkov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 38898/04, §§ 91-96, 31 January 2017).

• EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 52342/20

  LAVROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  7077/06 and 12 others, 26 June 2018, Rozhkov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 38898/04, §§ 91-96, 31 January 2017, Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, § 67, 13 February 2018, Kuptsov and Kuptsova v. Russia, no. 6110/03, § 81, 3 March 2011, and Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 34241/16

  KHORRSHR AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  7077/06 and 12 others, 26 June 2018, Rozhkov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 38898/04, §§ 91-96, 31 January 2017, Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, § 67, 13 February 2018, Kuptsov and Kuptsova v. Russia, no. 6110/03, § 81, 3 March 2011, and Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos.

 
• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 20948/13

  MEZAK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  7077/06 and 12 others, 26 June 2018, Rozhkov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 38898/04, §§ 91-96, 31 January 2017, Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, § 67, 13 February 2018, Kuptsov and Kuptsova v. Russia, no. 6110/03, § 81, 3 March 2011, and Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 13079/17

  PROKAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-08 and 154-58, 22 May 2012, concerning conditions of transport of detainees and the lack of a speedy review of detention matters; Rozhkov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 38898/04, §§ 91-96, 31 January 2017, concerning forced attendance for questioning, and Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 108-11, 27 November 2012, as regards excessive length of pre-trial detention).
• EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 75045/11

  PUGACHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  5 (1) (c) - unlawful pre-trial detention - Detention for more than three hours without any written record (see Fortalnov and Others v. Russia, nos. 7077/06 and 12 others, §§ 76-79, 26 June 2018), forced attendance without evidence of proper summons to appear or of failure by the applicant to comply without a valid excuse (see Rozhkov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 38898/04, §§ 91-96, 31 January 2017): the applicant was arrested, while being a witness, and detained from 9 a.m. on 17/03/2015 to 5.45 p.m. on 18/03/2015.
• EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 3345/18

  OVCHAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  7077/06 and 12 others, 26 June 2018, Rozhkov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 38898/04, §§ 91-96, 31 January 2017, Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, § 67, 13 February 2018, Kuptsov and Kuptsova v. Russia, no. 6110/03, § 81, 3 March 2011, and Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR - 41232/18 (anhängig)

  POPOV v. RUSSIAd 29 other applications

  The applications concern complaints raised under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention relating to unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty) which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Fortalnov and Others v. Russia, nos. 7077/06 and 12 others, 26 June 2018, Rozhkov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 38898/04, §§ 91-96, 31 January 2017, Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, § 67, 13 February 2018, Kuptsov and Kuptsova v. Russia, no. 6110/03, § 81, 3 March 2011 and Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 29.06.2021 - 4711/07

  MANOLE AND POSTICA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

  It also recalls that no issue arises under Article 5 § 4 where the impugned detention is of a short detention and the detainee is released speedily before any judicial review of the lawfulness of his or her detention could take place (see Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, §§ 158-159, ECHR 2003-X and Rozhkov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 38898/04, § 65, 31 January 2017).
• EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 9347/14

  MOUSTAHI c. FRANCE

  Dans des affaires concernant des privations de liberté de faible durée, la Cour a pu estimer superflu d'examiner le bien-fondé des griefs formulés par les requérants sur le terrain de l'article 5 § 4 de la Convention lorsque les intéressés avaient été relâchés avant tout contrôle juridictionnel de la légalité de leur détention, sans procéder à un examen in abstracto de la compatibilité des recours disponibles avec les conditions fixées par cet article (Slivenko c. Lettonie [GC], no 48321/99, §§ 158-159, CEDH 2003-X ; Rozhkov c. Russie (no 2), no 38898/04, § 65, 31 janvier 2017).
• EGMR - 48582/18 (anhängig)

  RUDAKOVA v. RUSSIA and 23 other applications
• EGMR - 38147/18 (anhängig)

  MAKHAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 18 other applications
• EGMR - 84744/17 (anhängig)

  AYDAROV v. RUSSIA and 19 other applications
• EGMR - 24712/21 (anhängig)

  KUZMIN v. RUSSIA and 13 other applications
• EGMR - 3001/18 (anhängig)

  KADULIN v. RUSSIA and 11 other applications
• EGMR - 30342/19 (anhängig)

  LEVCHENKO v. RUSSIA and 10 other applications
• EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 40408/18

  GORYUNKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 38503/18

  MIRONOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 76201/17

  KAVKAZSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 10722/21 (anhängig)

  KONOVALOVA v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications
• EGMR - 10869/18 (anhängig)

  RYABININ v. RUSSIA and 19 other applications
• EGMR - 26529/18 (anhängig)

  BOYAROV v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications
• EGMR - 4374/18 (anhängig)

  GOGOLEV v. RUSSIA and 13 other applications
• EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 33015/06

  VOSKOBOYNIKOV v. UKRAINE