Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 44399/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,62237) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 44399/05
- EGMR, 06.12.2012 - 44399/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 28.10.1987 - 8695/79
Inze ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 44399/05
The scope of the margin of appreciation will vary according to the circumstances, the subject matter and its background (see Rasmussen v. Denmark, judgment of 28 November 1984, Series A no. 87, § 40, and Inze v. Austria, judgment of 28 October 1987, Series A no. 126, § 41), but the final decision as to observance of the Convention's requirements rests with the Court. - EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80
LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 44399/05
A difference in treatment in the exercise of a right laid down by the Convention must not only pursue a legitimate aim: Article 14 is likewise violated when it is clearly established that there is no "reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised" (see, for example, Petrovic, cited above, § 30, and Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, § 177). - EGMR, 28.11.1984 - 8777/79
RASMUSSEN v. DENMARK
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 44399/05
The scope of the margin of appreciation will vary according to the circumstances, the subject matter and its background (see Rasmussen v. Denmark, judgment of 28 November 1984, Series A no. 87, § 40, and Inze v. Austria, judgment of 28 October 1987, Series A no. 126, § 41), but the final decision as to observance of the Convention's requirements rests with the Court.