Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 8945/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,54772) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CETINKAYA v. TURKEY
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 8945/04
- EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 8945/04
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00
BURDOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 8945/04
The Court also notes that it has consistently held that a "claim" can only constitute a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 if it is sufficiently established to be enforceable (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 40, ECHR 2002-III, and Poltorachenko v. Ukraine, no. 77317/01, § 45, 18 January 2005). - EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 77317/01
POLTORACHENKO v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 8945/04
The Court also notes that it has consistently held that a "claim" can only constitute a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 if it is sufficiently established to be enforceable (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 40, ECHR 2002-III, and Poltorachenko v. Ukraine, no. 77317/01, § 45, 18 January 2005). - EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74
MARCKX v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 8945/04
The Court reiterates that Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 only enshrines the right to the peaceful enjoyment of existing possessions (see Marckx v. Belgium, judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 23, § 50).