Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DIMITAR YANAKIEV v. BULGARIA (No. 2)

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07

  GHERGHINA c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 50346/07

  The purpose of this rule is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity to prevent or put right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, among other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V, and Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, 9 July 2015).

  Such case-law must in principle be well established and date back to the period before the application was lodged (see, among other authorities, Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, 9 July 2015; Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 110, ECHR 2006-VII; Norbert Sikorski v. Poland, no. 17599/05, § 115, 22 October 2009; and Zutter v. France (dec.), no. 197/96, 27 June 2000).

• RG, 24.10.1896 - I 197/96

  Rückforderung des auf Grund eines wider die Ehrbarkeit laufenden Vertrages zu …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 50346/07

  Such case-law must in principle be well established and date back to the period before the application was lodged (see, among other authorities, Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, 9 July 2015; Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 110, ECHR 2006-VII; Norbert Sikorski v. Poland, no. 17599/05, § 115, 22 October 2009; and Zutter v. France (dec.), no. 197/96, 27 June 2000).
• EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 17599/05

  NORBERT SIKORSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 50346/07

  Such case-law must in principle be well established and date back to the period before the application was lodged (see, among other authorities, Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, 9 July 2015; Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 110, ECHR 2006-VII; Norbert Sikorski v. Poland, no. 17599/05, § 115, 22 October 2009; and Zutter v. France (dec.), no. 197/96, 27 June 2000).

 
• EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06

  McFARLANE v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 50346/07

  Where the Government claims non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, it bears the burden of proving that the applicant has not used a remedy that was both effective and available (see Dalia v. France, 19 February 1998, § 38, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I; McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 107, 10 September 2010).
• EGMR, 24.06.2003 - 44277/98

  STRETCH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 50346/07

  In addition, there must be a clear causal connection between the damage claimed by the applicant and the breach (see, among other authorities, Stretch v. the United Kingdom, no. 44277/98, § 47, 24 June 2003).
• EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 40450/04

  YURIY NIKOLAYEVICH IVANOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 50346/07

  As regards remedies in the context of enforcement of domestic judicial decisions, the Court has held that any domestic means to prevent a violation by ensuring timely enforcement is, in principle, of greatest value (see Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, § 98, ECHR 2009, and Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine, no. 40450/04, § 65, ECHR 2009-...(extracts)).
• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04

  BURDOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 50346/07

  As regards remedies in the context of enforcement of domestic judicial decisions, the Court has held that any domestic means to prevent a violation by ensuring timely enforcement is, in principle, of greatest value (see Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, § 98, ECHR 2009, and Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine, no. 40450/04, § 65, ECHR 2009-...(extracts)).
• EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 27451/09

  NAGOVITSYN AND NALGIYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 50346/07

  27451/09 and 60650/09, § 33, 23 September 2010).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 50346/07

  The purpose of this rule is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity to prevent or put right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, among other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V, and Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, 9 July 2015).

• EGMR, 08.06.2023 - 46530/09

  URGESI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Celle-ci doit être bien établie et antérieure à la date d'introduction de la requête (Dimitar Yanakiev c. Bulgarie (no 2), no 50346/07, §§ 53 et 63, 31 mars 2016, Gherghina, décision précitée, § 88, et Sürmeli c. Allemagne [GC], no 75529/01, §§ 110-112, CEDH 2006-VII).
• EGMR - 34706/18 (anhängig)

  TEYMURAZYAN v. ARMENIA

  29920/05 and 10 others §§ 168, 177-179 and 182-183, 1 July 2014; and Dimitar Yanakiev v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 50346/07, §§ 69-70 and 76-77, 31 March 2016)?.