Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KATANI ET AUTRES contre l'ALLEMAGNE

  Art. 9, Art. 13, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 3 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (20)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87

  VILVARAJAH ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.05.2001 - 67679/01

  La Cour rappelle tout d'abord que les États contractants ont, en vertu d'un principe de droit international bien établi et sans préjudice des engagements découlant pour eux de traités internationaux, y compris la Convention, le droit de contrôler l'entrée, le séjour et l'éloignement des non-nationaux, ni la Convention ni ses Protocoles ne consacrant le droit à l'asile politique (arrêt Vilvarajah et autres c. Royaume-Uni du 30 octobre 1991, série A n° 215, p. 34, § 102).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.05.2001 - 67679/01

  La simple allégation de répercussions lointaines ne saurait suffire (arrêt Soering c. Royaume-Uni du 7 juillet 1989, série A n° 161, p. 33, § 85; Kavak c. Allemagne précitée; Commission, n° 12102/86, décision du 9 mai 1986, Décisions et Rapports 47, p. 286).

• EGMR, 23.02.2012 - 27765/09

  Italiens Flüchtlingspolitik: Rechte auch auf hoher See

  With regard to the expulsion procedure, see Maaouia v. France ([GC], no. 39652/98, ECHR 2000-X), and to the asylum procedure see Katani v. Germany ((dec), no. 67679/01, 31 May 2001).
• EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 35661/11

  PEREZ LIZASO v. FINLAND

  At the same time, the mere possibility of ill-treatment on account of an unsettled situation in the requesting country does not in itself give rise to a breach of Article 3 (see Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, cited above, § 111; and Katani and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 67679/01, 31 May 2001).

  The Court notes that the mere possibility of ill-treatment in the requesting country does not in itself give rise to a breach of Article 3 of the Convention (see Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, cited above, § 111; and Katani and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 67679/01, 31 May 2001).

• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 14743/11

  ABDULKHAKOV v. RUSSIA

  At the same time, the mere possibility of ill-treatment on account of an unsettled situation in the requesting country does not in itself give rise to a breach of Article 3 (see Vilvarajah and Others, cited above, § 111, and Katani and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 67679/01, 31 May 2001).

 
• EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 2440/07

  SOLDATENKO v. UKRAINE

  At the same time, it has held that the mere possibility of ill-treatment on account of an unsettled situation in the receiving country does not in itself give rise to a breach of Article 3 (see Vilvarajah and Others, cited above, § 111, and Fatgan Katani and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 67679/01, 31 May 2001) and that, where the sources available to it describe a general situation, an applicant's specific allegations in a particular case require corroboration by other evidence (see Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 73, ECHR 2005-I).
• EGMR, 02.04.2015 - 27945/10

  SARKÖZI AND MAHRAN v. AUSTRIA

  The Court reiterates that decisions regarding the entry, stay and deportation of aliens do not concern the determination of an applicant's civil rights or obligations or of a criminal charge against him within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652/98, § 40, ECHR 2000-X, and Katani and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 67679/01, 31 May 2001).
• EGMR, 07.05.2014 - 44689/09

  SAFAII v. AUSTRIA

  In accordance with the Court's case-law (see Fatgan Katani and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 67679/01, ECHR 31 May 2001, and, mutatis mutandis, Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652/98, § 40, ECHR 2000-X), it follows that this complaint is incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4.
• EGMR, 17.05.2016 - 44944/15

  A.A. v. AUSTRIA

  Concerning the complaint under Article 6 of the Convention, the Court reiterates that the guarantees of that provision are not applicable to asylum proceedings (see Katani and others v. Germany (dec.), no. 67679/01, 31 May 2001, and Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652/98, § 40, ECHR 2000-X).
• EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 21055/09

  KHAYDAROV v. RUSSIA

  At the same time, the mere possibility of ill-treatment on account of an unsettled situation in the receiving country does not in itself give rise to a breach of Article 3 (see Vilvarajah and Others, cited above, § 111, and Fatgan Katani and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 67679/01, 31 May 2001).
• EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 51243/08

  PUZAN v. UKRAINE

  At the same time, it has held that the mere possibility of ill-treatment on account of an unsettled situation in the receiving country does not in itself give rise to a breach of Article 3 (see Vilvarajah and Others, cited above, § 111, and Fatgan Katani and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 67679/01, 31 May 2001) and that, where the sources available to it describe a general situation, an applicant's specific allegations in a particular case require corroboration by other evidence (see Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 73, ECHR 2005-I).
• EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 60104/08

  SHARIFI v. AUSTRIA

  The Court reiterates that decisions regarding the entry, stay and deportation of aliens do not concern the determination of an applicant's civil rights or obligations or of a criminal charge against him within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652/98, § 40, ECHR 2000-X, and Katani and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 67679/01, 31 May 2001).
• EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 8969/10

  OMEREDO v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 24268/08

  KLEIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 20113/07

  Y v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 20203/11

  ONYEJIEKWE v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 03.06.2010 - 19316/09

  GALEYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.05.2010 - 52466/08

  KHODZHAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 43136/02

  BASNET v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 40755/16

  B.T. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 3990/06

  KAMYSHEV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 03.03.2011 - 66317/09

  ELMURATOV v. RUSSIA