Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 31.05.2012 - 14966/04   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2012,15733
EGMR, 31.05.2012 - 14966/04 (https://dejure.org/2012,15733)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 31.05.2012 - 14966/04 (https://dejure.org/2012,15733)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 31. Mai 2012 - 14966/04 (https://dejure.org/2012,15733)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,15733) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    VASILEV ET DOYCHEVA c. BULGARIE

    Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
    Partiellement irrecevable Violation de l'article 1 du Protocole n° 1 - Protection de la propriété (article 1 al. 1 du Protocole n° 1 - Respect des biens Biens) Violation de l'article 13 - Droit à un recours effectif (Article 13 - Recours effectif) Dommage matériel et préjudice moral - réparation (französisch)

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (14)

  • EGMR, 17.06.2014 - 37857/05

    KARAIVANOVA AND MILEVA v. BULGARIA

    The Court notes that it has found violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in numerous cases against Bulgaria on the ground of lengthy delays in the procedures for restitution of agricultural land which affected the applicants" legitimate expectations of restitution or compensation (see Lyubomir Popov, Sivova and Koleva, and Nedelcheva and Others, all cited above; as well as Naydenov v. Bulgaria, no. 17353/03, 26 November 2009; Mutishev and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 18967/03, 3 December 2009; Vasilev and Doycheva v. Bulgaria, no. 14966/04, 31 May 2012; Petkova and Others v. Bulgaria [Committee], nos.
  • EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 17705/05

    ILIEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

    In numerous previous cases against Bulgaria the Court has found violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on the ground of lengthy delays in the restitution procedure, which had affected the applicants" legitimate expectation of restitution or compensation (see, for example, Lyubomir Popov, §§ 119-24, Sivova and Koleva, §§ 115-19, Nedelcheva and Others, §§ 71-84, and Karaivanova and Mileva, §§ 79-82, all cited above; see also Mutishev and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 18967/03, §§ 139-45, 3 December 2009; Vasilev and Doycheva v. Bulgaria, no. 14966/04, §§ 47-53, 31 May 2012; Petkova and Others v. Bulgaria [Committee], nos. 19130/04, 17694/05 and 27777/06, 25 September 2012; and Ivanov v. Bulgaria [Committee], no. 19988/06, 11 December 2012).
  • EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 5516/05

    NEDELCHEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

    As to the delays in the restitution process, the Court refers to its findings in cases against Bulgaria concerning similar complaints (see Vasilev and Doycheva v. Bulgaria, no. 14966/04, §§ 26-30, 31 May 2012, with further references) that a tort claim could not be considered an effective remedy, as it was of a purely compensatory nature and could not bring about the completion of the restitution process.
  • EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 19988/06

    IVANOV v. BULGARIA

    The Court refers to its established case-law in similar cases (see Naydenov, cited above, §§ 64-70, and Vasilev and Doycheva v. Bulgaria, no. 14966/04, §§ 37-42, 31 May 2012) and is satisfied that the applicant, whose right to restitution "in actual boundaries" had been recognised by the Silistra District Court in a final judgment of 26 June 1998 (see paragraph 12 above), had a sufficiently established "asset" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
  • EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 41064/05

    HADZHIGEORGIEVI v. BULGARIA

    The Court has dismissed a similar objection in a number of other cases against Bulgaria concerning delays in completing the parallel process of restitution of agricultural land (see Lyubomir Popov v. Bulgaria, no. 69855/01, §§ 102-107, 7 January 2010; Vasilev and Doycheva v. Bulgaria, no. 14966/04, §§ 26-30, 31 May 2012; and Petkova and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 19130/04, 17694/05 and 27777/06, 25 September 2012).
  • EGMR, 02.06.2015 - 44103/05

    NEDYALKOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

    In numerous previous cases against Bulgaria, the Court has found violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on the grounds of lengthy delays in the restitution procedure which had affected the applicants" right to restitution or compensation (see, for example, Sivova and Koleva, §§ 115-19, Nedelcheva and Others, §§ 71-84, and Karaivanova and Mileva, §§ 79-82, all cited above; see also Mutishev and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 18967/03, §§ 139-45, 3 December 2009; Lyubomir Popov v. Bulgaria, no. 69855/01, §§ 119-24, 7 January 2010; and Vasilev and Doycheva v. Bulgaria, no. 14966/04, §§ 47-53, 31 May 2012).
  • EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 36094/08

    POPOV AND CHONIN v. BULGARIA

    The Court has found violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in numerous cases against Bulgaria concerning the application of legislation on the restitution of agricultural land, on the ground of lengthy delays in the procedures, which affected the applicants" right to restitution or compensation (see, for example, Lyubomir Popov v. Bulgaria, no. 69855/01, 7 January 2010; Naydenov v. Bulgaria, no. 17353/03, 26 November 2009; Vasilev and Doycheva v. Bulgaria, no. 14966/04, 31 May 2012; and Nedelcheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 5516/05, 28 May 2013).
  • EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 19130/04

    PETKOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

    Its provisions concerning the restitution of agricultural land, the possibility of compensation in lieu of restitution, and the relevant procedures have been summarised in the Court's judgments in the cases of Lyubomir Popov v. Bulgaria (no. 69855/01, §§ 83-88 and 92-92, 7 January 2010) and Vasilev and Doycheva v. Bulgaria (no. 14966/04, §§ 19-23, 31 May 2012).
  • EGMR, 26.01.2016 - 34669/10

    HANDZHIYSKI v. BULGARIA

    The Court has found violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the excessive delays in proceedings concerning restitution of agricultural land in a number of cases against Bulgaria (see Naydenov v. Bulgaria, no. 17353/03, 26 November 2009; Lyubomir Popov v. Bulgaria, no. 69855/01, 7 January 2010; Vasilev and Doycheva v. Bulgaria, no. 14966/04, 31 May 2012; Petkova and Others v. Bulgaria [Committee], nos.
  • EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 52035/07

    TODOROVA v. BULGARIA

    The Court has found violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the excessive delays in proceedings concerning restitution of agricultural land in a number of cases against Bulgaria (see Lyubomir Popov v. Bulgaria, no. 69855/01, 7 January 2010; Naydenov v. Bulgaria, no. 17353/03, 26 November 2009; Vasilev and Doycheva v. Bulgaria, no. 14966/04, 31 May 2012; Nedelcheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 5516/05, 28 May 2013; Petkova and Others v. Bulgaria [Committee], nos.
  • EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 55521/07

    HRISAFOVA-VANTSOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 11892/05

    SIRAKOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 29886/06

    LAMBREVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 39135/06

    FILIPOV v. BULGARIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht