Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 31.05.2012 - 36268/02, 16297/08, 17068/08, 24717/07, 25416/04, 25500/04, 43454/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 31.05.2012 - 36268/02, 16297/08, 17068/08, 24717/07, 25416/04, 25500/04, 43454/06 (https://dejure.org/2012,16738)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 31.05.2012 - 36268/02, 16297/08, 17068/08, 24717/07, 25416/04, 25500/04, 43454/06 (https://dejure.org/2012,16738)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 31. Mai 2012 - 36268/02, 16297/08, 17068/08, 24717/07, 25416/04, 25500/04, 43454/06 (https://dejure.org/2012,16738)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,16738) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
JARNEA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 31.01.1986 - 8734/79
BARTHOLD v. GERMANY (ARTICLE 50)
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.05.2012 - 36268/02
The second and third rules are concerned with particular instances of interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of property and should therefore be construed in the light of the principle enunciated in the first rule (see, among other authorities, James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 37, Series A no. 98, which reiterates in part the principles laid down by the Court in Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 61, Series A no. 52; see also Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 134, ECHR 2004-V, and Hutten-Czapska, cited above, § 157). - EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.05.2012 - 36268/02
The second and third rules are concerned with particular instances of interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of property and should therefore be construed in the light of the principle enunciated in the first rule (see, among other authorities, James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 37, Series A no. 98, which reiterates in part the principles laid down by the Court in Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 61, Series A no. 52; see also Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 134, ECHR 2004-V, and Hutten-Czapska, cited above, § 157).