Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 31.07.2007 - 19134/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,67879) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BOLYUKH v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 6 Violation of P1-1 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99
RIABYKH c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2007 - 19134/05
A departure from that principle is justified only when made necessary by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character (see, mutatis mutandis, Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 52, ECHR 2003-X; and Pravednaya v. Russia, no. 69529/01, § 25, 18 November 2004). - EGMR, 18.11.2004 - 69529/01
PRAVEDNAYA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2007 - 19134/05
A departure from that principle is justified only when made necessary by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character (see, mutatis mutandis, Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 52, ECHR 2003-X; and Pravednaya v. Russia, no. 69529/01, § 25, 18 November 2004). - EGMR, 25.01.2007 - 21823/03
DENISOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2007 - 19134/05
Having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III; and, more recently, Reynbakh v. Russia, no. 23405/03, 29 September 2005, and Denisov v. Russia, no. 21823/03, 25 January 2007), the Court finds that by failing for a substantial period to comply with the judgment in the applicant's favour, the domestic authorities violated her right to a court and prevented her from receiving the money she was entitled to receive. - EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 23405/03
REYNBAKH v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2007 - 19134/05
Having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III; and, more recently, Reynbakh v. Russia, no. 23405/03, 29 September 2005, and Denisov v. Russia, no. 21823/03, 25 January 2007), the Court finds that by failing for a substantial period to comply with the judgment in the applicant's favour, the domestic authorities violated her right to a court and prevented her from receiving the money she was entitled to receive.