Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 40020/03 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
M. AND OTHERS v. ITALY AND BULGARIA
Art. 3, Art. 34, Art. 35 MRK
Preliminary objection partially dismissed (Article 34 - Victim) Preliminary objection partially allowed (Article 34 - Victim) Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (Italy) ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
M. AND OTHERS v. ITALY AND BULGARIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)
[DEU] Preliminary objection partially dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection partially allowed (Article 34 - Victim);Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) ...
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
M. AND OTHERS v. ITALY AND BULGARIA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 40020/03
- EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 40020/03
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (23)
- EGMR, 26.07.2005 - 73316/01
SILIADIN v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 40020/03
In Siliadin, considering the scope of "slavery" under Article 4, the Court referred to the classic definition of slavery contained in the 1926 Slavery Convention, which required the exercise of a genuine right of ownership and reduction of the status of the individual concerned to an "object" (see Siliadin v. France, no. 73316/01, § 122, ECHR 2005-VII). - EGMR, 21.11.2001 - 35763/97
AL-ADSANI c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 40020/03
However, in each case the State's obligation applied only in relation to ill-treatment allegedly committed within its jurisdiction (see Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, § 38, ECHR 2001-XI, where the Court did not uphold the applicant's claim that the Convention required the United Kingdom to assist one of its citizens in obtaining an effective remedy for torture against another State since it had not been contended that the alleged torture took place in the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom or that the United Kingdom authorities had any causal connection with its occurrence). - EGMR, 11.06.2002 - 36042/97
WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 40020/03
The Court's case-law on Article 14 establishes that discrimination means treating differently, without an objective and reasonable justification, persons in relevantly similar situations (see Willis v. the United Kingdom, no. 36042/97, § 48, ECHR 2002-IV).
- EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98
M.C. c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 40020/03
Indeed, the Convention requires effective deterrence against grave acts such as rape, and children and other vulnerable individuals, in particular, are entitled to effective protection (see, mutatis mutandis, M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 150, ECHR 2003-XII). - EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02
Opuz ./. Türkei
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 40020/03
The Court further notes that even assuming that it was true that the events at issue amounted to a marriage in accordance with the Roma traditions, it was still alleged that in the month the first applicant stayed in Ghislarengo she had been beaten and forced to have sexual intercourse with Y. The Court notes that State authorities must take protective measures in the form of effective deterrence against serious breaches of an individual's personal integrity also by a husband (see Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, §§ 160-176, 9 June 2009) or partner. - EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04
SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 40020/03
The Court reiterates that marriage has deep-rooted social and cultural connotations which may differ largely from one society to another (see Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04, § 62, ECHR 2010). - EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 40020/03
(see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 145, ECHR 2005-VII). - EGMR, 12.11.2008 - 34503/97
Demir und Baykara ./. Türkei - Streikrecht für Beamte
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 40020/03
The Court has never considered the provisions of the Convention as the sole framework of reference for the interpretation of the rights and freedoms enshrined therein (see Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no. 34503/97, § 67, 12 November 2008). - EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88
Jens Söring
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 40020/03
The Court reiterates that the engagement undertaken by a Contracting State under Article 1 of the Convention is confined to "securing" ("reconnaître" in the French text) the listed rights and freedoms to persons within its own "jurisdiction" (see Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 86, Series A no. 161). - EGMR, 23.11.1983 - 8919/80
VAN DER MUSSELE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 40020/03
For "forced or compulsory labour" to arise, the Court has held that there must be some physical or mental constraint, as well as some overriding of the person's will (see Van der Mussele v. Belgium, 23 November 1983, § 34, Series A no. 70; Siliadin, cited above, § 117). - EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74
ARTICO c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00
KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96
BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 26.10.2004 - 44093/98
ÇELIK AND IMRET v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 42234/02
ERDEM v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 49151/07
Muñoz Diaz ./. Spanien
- EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 61164/00
DURINGER et AUTRES et GRUNGE contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94
ÇAKICI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94
TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 25760/94
IPEK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 74153/01
POPOV v. MOLDOVA (No. 1)