Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 31.08.1999 - 33726/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1999,33347) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BEDÖ v. AUSTRIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90
VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.1999 - 33726/96
Moreover, as a general rule, the assessment of the facts is within the province of the national courts (see the Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, pp. 19-20, § 60). - EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86
LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.1999 - 33726/96
The Court further reiterates that the admissibility of evidence, as well as the taking of evidence, are governed primarily by the rules of domestic law and that it is, in principle, for the national courts to assess the evidence before them (see the Sidiropoulos and Others v. Greece judgment of 10 July 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-IV, p. 1617, § 45; the Saïdi v. France judgment of 20 September 1993, Series A no. 261-C, p. 56, § 43, as well as the Lüdi v. Switzerland judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, p. 20, § 43, and the Schenk v. Switzerland judgment of 12 July 1988, p. 29, § 46).