Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 31.08.2010 - 36665/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,60432) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SURBANOSKA AND OTHERS v. \
Art. 6, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 24549/03
MICHALAK v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2010 - 36665/03
Some States, such as Austria, Croatia, Spain, Poland and the Slovak Republic, have understood the situation perfectly by choosing to combine two types of remedy, one designed to expedite the proceedings and the other to afford compensation (see, for example, Holzinger (no. 1), cited above, § 22; Slavicek v. Croatia (dec.), no. 20862/02, ECHR 2002-VII; Fernandez-Molina Gonzalez and Others v. Spain (dec.), no. 64359/01, ECHR 2002-IX; Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, 1 March 2005; and Andrásik and Others v. Slovakia (dec.), nos. - EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 20862/02
SLAVICEK contre la CROATIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2010 - 36665/03
Some States, such as Austria, Croatia, Spain, Poland and the Slovak Republic, have understood the situation perfectly by choosing to combine two types of remedy, one designed to expedite the proceedings and the other to afford compensation (see, for example, Holzinger (no. 1), cited above, § 22; Slavicek v. Croatia (dec.), no. 20862/02, ECHR 2002-VII; Fernandez-Molina Gonzalez and Others v. Spain (dec.), no. 64359/01, ECHR 2002-IX; Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, 1 March 2005; and Andrásik and Others v. Slovakia (dec.), nos. - EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00
ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2010 - 36665/03
57984/00, 60226/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00 and 68563/01, ECHR 2002-IX). - EGMR, 08.10.2002 - 64359/01
FERNANDEZ-MOLINA GONZALEZ et AUTRES contre l'ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2010 - 36665/03
Some States, such as Austria, Croatia, Spain, Poland and the Slovak Republic, have understood the situation perfectly by choosing to combine two types of remedy, one designed to expedite the proceedings and the other to afford compensation (see, for example, Holzinger (no. 1), cited above, § 22; Slavicek v. Croatia (dec.), no. 20862/02, ECHR 2002-VII; Fernandez-Molina Gonzalez and Others v. Spain (dec.), no. 64359/01, ECHR 2002-IX; Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, 1 March 2005; and Andrásik and Others v. Slovakia (dec.), nos. - EGMR, 21.09.2016 - 58263/00
TIMOFEYEV AND 234 OTHER CASES AGAINST THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2010 - 36665/03
This request cannot be regarded as unreasonable (see Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, § 69, ECHR 2009).