Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MILOSEVIC v. CROATIA

  Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice-general (Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Criminal offence);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MILOSEVIC v. CROATIA

  Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 4 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 10.02.2009 - 14939/03

  Sergeï Zolotoukhine ./. Russland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 12022/16

  Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention is understood as prohibiting the prosecution or trial of a second "offence" in so far as it arose from identical facts or facts which were substantially the same (see Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939/03, § 82, ECHR 2009; Margus v. Croatia [GC], no. 4455/10, § 114, ECHR 2014; and A and B v. Norway [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 12277/04

  STORBR?TEN v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 12022/16

  However, the legal characterisation of the procedure under national law cannot be the sole criterion of relevance for the applicability of the principle of ne bis in idem under Article 4 § 1 of Protocol No. 7. Otherwise, the application of this provision would be left to the discretion of the Contracting States to a degree that might lead to results incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention (see, for example, Storbråten v. Norway (dec.), no. 12277/04, ECHR 2007 (extracts), with further references).
• EGMR - 68271/14 (anhängig)

  HALL v. ICELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 12022/16

  68273/14 and 68271/14, § 76, 22 December 2020).
• EGMR, 15.11.2016 - 24130/11

  A ET B c. NORVÈGE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 12022/16

  24130/11 and 29758/11, § 108, 15 November 2016).

• EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 60130/16

  URH v. CROATIA

  Having reviewed the circumstances of the case as a whole, the Court thus considers that the two sets of proceedings cannot be said to have been sufficiently connected in substance, as required under the Court's case-law, to form part of an integral scheme of sanctions under Croatian law for hitting a person in a public space (see, mutatis mutandis, Milosevic v. Croatia, no. 12022/16, § 42, 31 August 2021).
• EGMR - 37405/22 (anhängig)

  ? EPINSKI v. CROATIA

  Has the applicant been tried and punished twice for the same offence, as prohibited by Article 4 § 1 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention (see Milosevic v. Croatia, no. 12022/16, §§ 27-43, 31 August 2021)?.