Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 44180/17 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,38378) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SADLIK v. POLAND
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EuGH, 26.02.2015 - C-143/13
Matei - Richtlinie 93/13/EWG - Missbräuchliche Klauseln in Verträgen zwischen …
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 44180/17
In particular, in its judgment of 26 February 2015 in the case of Matei v. SC Volksbank România SA (case C-143/13), the CJEU held, essentially, that the types of terms in loan agreements concluded between professionals and consumers which allowed the lender, under certain conditions, to unilaterally alter the interest rate or to apply a risk charge were not covered by the exceptions prescribed in Article 4(2) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95/29), and therefore could be "verified" by the courts.
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 50849/21
WALESA v. POLAND
In particular, they referred to cases concerning loans denominated in Swiss francs (see Sadlik v. Poland, no. 44180/17, § 3, 31 August 2021 [Committee decision]), inheritance matters, usurious loans, employees' rights and the return of children born in Poland, under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.