Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.12.2020 - 11620/17 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,40905) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
YEVSTRATYEV v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
YEVSTRATYEV v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04
POPOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2020 - 11620/17
It further refers to its settled case-law to the effect that when an applicant has suffered an infringement of his rights guaranteed by Article 6 of the Convention, he should, as far as possible, be put in the position in which he would have been had the requirements of that provision not been disregarded, and that the most appropriate form of redress would, in principle, be the reopening of the proceedings, if requested (see, mutatis mutandis, Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, § 210 in fine, ECHR 2005-IV, and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 263, 13 July 2006). - EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65
DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2020 - 11620/17
It concluded that the domestic courts" refusals to admit reports prepared by "specialists" as evidence had breached the principle of equality of arms (ibid., §§ 724-35), which, according to its well-established case-law, is one of the features of the wider concept of fair trial by an independent and impartial tribunal (see, for example, Delcourt v. Belgium, 17 January 1970, § 28, Series A no. 11). - EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2020 - 11620/17
Article 6 § 3 (d) leaves it to them, again as a general rule, to assess whether it is appropriate to call witnesses" (see Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, § 33, Series A no. 235-B).