Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KASMI v. ALBANIA

  Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 47045/06

  AMATO GAUCI v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 1175/06

  Finding it natural that the margin of appreciation available to the legislature in implementing social and economic policies should be a wide one, the Court has on many occasions declared that it will respect the legislature's judgment as to what is in the "public" or "general" interest unless that judgment is manifestly without reasonable foundation (see, amongst other authorities, Hutten-Czapska v. Poland [GC], no. 35014/97, §§ 165-66, ECHR 2006-VIII, and Amato Gauci v. Malta, no. 47045/06, § 54, 15 September 2009).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 22774/93

  IMMOBILIARE SAFFI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 1175/06

  Indeed, where an issue in the general interest is at stake, it is incumbent on the public authorities to act in good time, and in an appropriate and consistent manner (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy, [GC], no. 22774/93, § 54, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 10522/83

  Mellacher u.a. ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 1175/06

  In this connection, the Court notes that the relevant legal framework was aimed at providing housing protection to a limited category of tenants who would be affected by the restitution of properties to former owners in a transitional context; as such, it did not amount to a general system of rent control for the benefit of low-income households (contrast Riedel and Others v. Slovakia, nos. 44218/07 and 3 others, §§ 7 and 28-33, 10 January 2017; Hutten-Czapska, cited above, §§ 154-225; and Mellacher and Others v. Austria, 19 December 1989, §§ 42-47, Series A no. 169).

• VG Düsseldorf, 19.05.2006 - 24 L 481/06

  D (A), Unionsbürger, Familienangehörige, Schwiegereltern, Drittstaatsangehörige, …

  Angesichts der fehlenden wirtschaftlichen Integration der seit vielen Jahren ausreisepflichtigen Antragsteller ist auch eine Unzumutbarkeit der Ausreise bzw. Abschiebung wegen eines Verstoßes gegen das Recht auf Privatleben, vgl. EGMR, Entscheidungen vom 16. September 2004 - 11103/03 -, Ghiban, NVwZ 2005, 1046, und vom 7. Oktober 2004 - 33743/04 -, Dragan, NVwZ 2005, 1043; OVG NRW, Beschlüsse vom 1. Juni 2005 - 18 B 677/05 - , vom 7. Februar 2006 - 18 E 1534/05, und vom 2. Mai 2006 - 18 A 1175/06 - VGH Baden- Württemberg, Beschluss vom 2. November 2005 - 1 S 3023/04 -, InfAuslR 2006, 70; VGH Hessen, Beschluss vom 15. Februar 2006 - 7 TG 106/06 -, InfAuslR 2006, 217, nicht ersichtlich.
• EGMR, 24.03.2022 - 66/12

  WYSZYNSKI v. POLAND

  The measure in question amounted to a control of the use of property to be examined under the second paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and with reference to the case-law concerning similar context (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 46, ECHR 1999-V; Ghigo v. Malta, no. 31122/05, § 50, 26 September 2006; and Kasmi v. Albania, no. 1175/06, § 72, 23 June 2020).
• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 28416/19

  FEJZAGIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  The Court has already found a breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in a number of cases concerning rent-control schemes (see, among other authorities, Hutten-Czapska v. Poland [GC], no. 35014/97, ECHR 2006-VIII; Bittó and Others v. Slovakia, no. 30255/09, 28 January 2014; Statileo v. Croatia, no. 12027/10, 10 July 2014; Anthony Aquilina v. Malta, no. 3851/12, 11 December 2014; and Kasmi v. Albania, no. 1175/06, 23 June 2020).
• EGMR - 84568/17 (anhängig)

  BILYAVSKA v. UKRAINE

  In particular, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (compare, for example, with Kasmi v. Albania, no. 1175/06, §§ 77-86, 23 June 2020)?.