Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BARSOVA v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  UDALOVA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 49669/07

  P.M. v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 20289/10

  Violations have been found in cases where the trial had continued unduly or had ended by prescription allowing the accused perpetrators to escape accountability (see Opuz, cited above, § 151, and P.M. v. Bulgaria, no. 49669/07, §§ 64-66, 24 January 2012).
• EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 52067/99

  OKKALI c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 20289/10

  This is essential for maintaining the public's confidence in, and support for, the rule of law and for preventing any appearance of the authorities" tolerance of or collusion in acts of violence (see Okkali v. Turkey, no. 52067/99, § 65, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 960/13

  KOSTECKAS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 20289/10

  Turning next to the State's obligation to conduct an effective investigation into all acts of domestic violence capable of leading to the punishment of the perpetrator, the Court reiterates that the requirements of promptness and thoroughness enshrined in Article 3 apply to the proceedings as a whole, including the trial stage (see M.A. v. Slovenia, no. 3400/07, § 48, 15 January 2015, and Kosteckas v. Lithuania, no. 960/13, § 41, 13 June 2017).

 
• EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 3400/07

  M.A. v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 20289/10

  Turning next to the State's obligation to conduct an effective investigation into all acts of domestic violence capable of leading to the punishment of the perpetrator, the Court reiterates that the requirements of promptness and thoroughness enshrined in Article 3 apply to the proceedings as a whole, including the trial stage (see M.A. v. Slovenia, no. 3400/07, § 48, 15 January 2015, and Kosteckas v. Lithuania, no. 960/13, § 41, 13 June 2017).
• EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

  Opuz ./. Türkei

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 20289/10

  The particular vulnerability of the victims of domestic violence and the need for active State involvement in their protection have been emphasised in a number of international instruments and well-established in the Court's case-law (see Bevacqua and S. v. Bulgaria, no. 71127/01, §§ 64-65, 12 June 2008; Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, §§ 72-86 and 132, ECHR 2009, and Hajduová v. Slovakia, no. 2660/03, § 46, 30 November 2010).
• EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 26608/11

  T.M. AND C.M. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 20289/10

  This obligation will not be satisfied if the protection afforded by domestic law exists only in theory; above all, it must also operate effectively in practice, and that requires a prompt examination of the case without unnecessary delays (see Opuz, cited above, §§ 145-51 and 168; Talpis, cited above, §§ 106 and 129, and T.M. and C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 26608/11, § 46, 28 January 2014).

• EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 40419/19

  VOLODINA v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  The Court has found violations of the obligation to conduct an effective investigation in cases where the proceedings had continued unduly or had ended by prescription allowing the perpetrators to escape accountability (see Opuz, cited above, § 151; P.M. v. Bulgaria, no. 49669/07, §§ 64-66, 24 January 2012, and, in a factually similar situation, Barsova v. Russia [Committee], no. 20289/10, §§ 35-40, 22 October 2019).