Rechtsprechung
   EGMR - 21123/09   

Anhängiges Verfahren
Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/9999,64822
EGMR - 21123/09 (https://dejure.org/9999,64822)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/9999,64822) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

  • EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 50356/08

    MEHMET SERIF ÖNER v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR - 21123/09
    (iii) Did the absence or delay of legal assistance in July-September 2005 entail "irretrievable" damage to the defence, thus leading to a violation of Article 6 of the Convention (see Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, § 55, ECHR 2008, and Mehmet Serif Öner v. Turkey, no. 50356/08, §§ 21-23, 13 September 2011)?.
  • EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 42371/02

    PAVLENKO v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR - 21123/09
    (c) Was there a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account of the use made of any tainted evidence at the applicants" trial (see for comparison Pavlenko v. Russia, no. 42371/02, §§ 114-20, 1 April 2010, and Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, §§ 165-66, ECHR 2010, with further references)? Were any alleged deficiencies arising out of the pre-trial problem relating to duress and legal assistance remedied at the trial and on appeal against the judgment of 15 May 2008?.
  • EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 48053/06

    USPANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    The Court also decided to award each of the applicants in application no. 21123/09 (Vitrigov and Others v. Russia) 67, 600 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage, and EUR 3, 000 jointly for costs and expenses, to be paid directly to the applicants' representative, and dismissed the remainder of their claims for just satisfaction.

    On 5 March 2021 the applicants' representative in application no. 21123/09 informed the Court that he had learned that one of the applicants, Mr Ayub Tuntuyev, had died on 12 March 2019, and that his wife, Ms Khedi Rasuyeva, wished to pursue the application.

    Decides to revise its judgment Uspanov and Others v. Russia of 9 February 2021 as regards application Vitrigov and Others v. Russia (no. 21123/09) in so far as it concerns the application of Article 41 of the Convention; Holds, accordingly (a) that the respondent State is to pay to Mr Ayub Tuntuyev's heir, Ms Khedi Rasuyeva, within three months, EUR 67, 600 (sixty-seven thousand six hundred euros) in respect of non-pecuniary damage, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement, plus any tax that may be chargeable;.

  • EGMR - 30885/16 (anhängig)

    TUNTUYEV v. RUSSIA

    On 23 March 2009 the applicant complained to the Court about the circumstances of his arrest and conviction for the above-mentioned attack (application no. 21123/09, Vitrigov and Others v. Russia).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht