Besprechungen u.ä.

---

Vor Ergehen der Entscheidung:

---

• voelkerrechtsblog.org (Aufsatz mit Bezug zum Verfahren - vor Ergehen der Entscheidung)

  Der Schutz der Menschenrechte im Cyberspace durch die EMRK

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  10 HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATIONS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 26839/05

  KENNEDY c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR - 24960/15

  The judgment addressed the current arrangements in place (i.e. as of 5 December 2014) for intercepting and sharing data and made extensive reference throughout to this Court's case-law, and in particular the cases of Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006-XI; Liberty v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, 1 July 2008; and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839/05, 18 May 2010.

  If so, were the restrictions in the IPT proceedings, taken as a whole, disproportionate or did they impair the very essence of the applicants" right to a fair trial (see Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839/05, § 186, 18 May 2010)?.

• EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 54934/00

  Menschenrechte: Verletzung der Privatsphäre und des Briefgeheimnisses durch das …

  Auszug aus EGMR - 24960/15

  The judgment addressed the current arrangements in place (i.e. as of 5 December 2014) for intercepting and sharing data and made extensive reference throughout to this Court's case-law, and in particular the cases of Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006-XI; Liberty v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, 1 July 2008; and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839/05, 18 May 2010.

  "in accordance with the law" and "necessary in a democratic society" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention, with reference to the principles set out in, among other authorities, Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006-XI; Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, 1 July 2008; and Iordachi and Others v. Moldova, no. 25198/02, 10 February 2009?.

• EGMR, 01.07.2008 - 58243/00

  LIBERTY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR - 24960/15

  The judgment addressed the current arrangements in place (i.e. as of 5 December 2014) for intercepting and sharing data and made extensive reference throughout to this Court's case-law, and in particular the cases of Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006-XI; Liberty v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, 1 July 2008; and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839/05, 18 May 2010.

  "in accordance with the law" and "necessary in a democratic society" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention, with reference to the principles set out in, among other authorities, Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006-XI; Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, 1 July 2008; and Iordachi and Others v. Moldova, no. 25198/02, 10 February 2009?.

 
• EGMR, 10.02.2009 - 25198/02

  IORDACHI AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 24960/15

  "in accordance with the law" and "necessary in a democratic society" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention, with reference to the principles set out in, among other authorities, Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006-XI; Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, 1 July 2008; and Iordachi and Others v. Moldova, no. 25198/02, 10 February 2009?.
• EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81

  LEANDER c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 24960/15

  The tribunal considered it plain that in the field of national security, much less was required to be put in the public domain and the degree of foreseeability required by Article 8 had to be reduced, because otherwise the whole purpose of the steps taken to protect national security would be at risk (citing Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, § 51, Series A no. 116).
• EGMR, 02.08.1984 - 8691/79

  MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR - 24960/15

  i) Appropriate rules or arrangements exist and are publicly known and confirmed to exist, with their content sufficiently signposted, such as to give an adequate indication of it (as per Malone... [v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82]).

• BGH, 02.03.2022 - 5 StR 457/21

  EncroChat-Daten zur Aufklärung schwerer Straftaten verwertbar

  Zu einem Beweisverwertungsverbot führende Verstöße gegen Art. 8 oder 10 EMRK sind bei einer auf der Grundlage eines hinreichenden Verdachts wegen schwerer Straftaten (die auch noch aktuell eine Gefahr für besonders wichtige Rechtsgüter darstellen) durch einen Richter angeordneten Überwachung im Ausmaß des vorliegenden Falls nicht festzustellen (vgl. zur Auslegung von Art. 8 und 10 EMRK im Zusammenhang mit einer - hier allerdings nicht einschlägigen - anlasslosen Internet-Kommunikationsüberwachung durch staatliche Nachrichtendienste EGMR (Große Kammer), Urteile vom 25. Mai 2021 - 58170/13, 62322/14, 24960/15 (Big Brother Watch u.a. gegen Vereinigtes Königsreich) und 35252/08 (Centrum för Rättvisa gegen Schweden); vgl. zur Thematik auch BVerfG, Urteil vom 19. Mai 2020 - 1 BvR 2835/17, BVerfGE 154, 152; Strate, HRRS 2022, 15, 17 f.).
• EGMR, 25.05.2021 - 58170/13

  BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  24960/15.

  24960/15.

  24960/15.

  24960/15.

  24960/15.

  24960/15.

  24960/15.

  24960/15.

  24960/15.

  24960/15.

• EGMR, 25.05.2021 - 35252/08

  CENTRUM FÖR RÄTTVISA v. SWEDEN

  Tout comme dans l'affaire Big Brother Watch et autres (nos 58170/13, 62322/14 et 24960/15), la méthodologie biaisée suivie par la Cour et le langage vague qu'elle emploie conduisent à un régime de garanties déficient en l'espèce[3].