Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 25809/17, 54060/17, 54093/17, 66246/17, 70377/17, 70380/17, 70393/17, 72318/17, 80759/17, 83506/17, 84551/17, 247/18, 256/18, 8721/18, 58117/18 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NAVALNYY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - ...
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (80) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11
NAVALNYY AND YASHIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 25809/17
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they disclose violations of Article 5 § 1, Article 6 § 1, Article 6 § 3 (d), Article 11 of the Convention and Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention in the light of its findings in Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia (no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014); Schatschaschwili v. Germany ([GC], no. 9154/10, §§ 100-31, ECHR 2015); Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 38-85, 20 September 2016); Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia (nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 179-91, 10 April 2018); Navalnyy v. Russia ([GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, §§ 71-72 and 83-84, 15 November 2018); and Korneyeva v. Russia (no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019), as indicated in the Appendix.11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.
11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.
11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.
11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.
11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.
11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.
11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.
11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and her arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.
11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and her arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.
11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and her arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.
11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.
11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.
11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.
11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and her arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.
- EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
KARELIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 25809/17
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they disclose violations of Article 5 § 1, Article 6 § 1, Article 6 § 3 (d), Article 11 of the Convention and Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention in the light of its findings in Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia (no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014); Schatschaschwili v. Germany ([GC], no. 9154/10, §§ 100-31, ECHR 2015); Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 38-85, 20 September 2016); Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia (nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 179-91, 10 April 2018); Navalnyy v. Russia ([GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, §§ 71-72 and 83-84, 15 November 2018); and Korneyeva v. Russia (no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019), as indicated in the Appendix.6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85, 20 September 2016);.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85, 20 September 2016);.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
6 § 1 - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 38-85,.
- EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 72051/17
KORNEYEVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 25809/17
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they disclose violations of Article 5 § 1, Article 6 § 1, Article 6 § 3 (d), Article 11 of the Convention and Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention in the light of its findings in Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia (no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014); Schatschaschwili v. Germany ([GC], no. 9154/10, §§ 100-31, ECHR 2015); Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 38-85, 20 September 2016); Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia (nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 179-91, 10 April 2018); Navalnyy v. Russia ([GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, §§ 71-72 and 83-84, 15 November 2018); and Korneyeva v. Russia (no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019), as indicated in the Appendix.5 § 1 - unlawful deprivation of liberty on 26-27 March 2017: the applicant remained in detention after the administrative-offence record had been compiled; no justification provided for not releasing the applicant (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019);.
5 § 1 - unlawful deprivation of liberty on 26-27 March 2017: escorting to the police station on 26/03/2017 for the purpose of drawing up the administrative offence record; the applicant remained in detention for 40 hours after the administrative-offence record had been compiled; no justification provided for not releasing the applicant (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019);.
5 § 1 - unlawful deprivation of liberty on 26-27 March 2017: escorting to the police station on 26/03/2017 for the purpose of drawing up the administrative offence record; the applicant remained in detention for 40 hours after the administrative-offence record had been compiled; no justification provided for not releasing the applicant (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019);.
5 § 1 - unlawful deprivation of liberty on 26-27 March 2017: escorting to the police station on 26/03/2017 for the purpose of drawing up the administrative offence record; the applicant remained in detention for 40 hours after the administrative-offence record had been compiled; no justification provided for not releasing the applicant (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019);.
- EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 54381/08
TSVETKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 25809/17
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they disclose violations of Article 5 § 1, Article 6 § 1, Article 6 § 3 (d), Article 11 of the Convention and Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention in the light of its findings in Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia (no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014); Schatschaschwili v. Germany ([GC], no. 9154/10, §§ 100-31, ECHR 2015); Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 38-85, 20 September 2016); Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia (nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 179-91, 10 April 2018); Navalnyy v. Russia ([GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, §§ 71-72 and 83-84, 15 November 2018); and Korneyeva v. Russia (no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019), as indicated in the Appendix.No. 7 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal: the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the first-instance court was executed immediately while the applicant's appeal against this decision was examined three days later (see Shvydka v. Ukraine, no. 17888/12, § 52, 30 October 2014, and Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 179-91, 10 April 2018).
No. 7 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal: the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the first-instance court was executed immediately while the applicant's appeal against this decision was examined three days later (see Shvydka v. Ukraine, no. 17888/12, § 52, 30 October 2014, and Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 179-91, 10 April 2018).
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 25809/17
It thus considers that Mr Navalnyy's remaining complaints are admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on them (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no.47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014). - EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 57818/09
LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 25809/17
The Court will examine this complaint under Article 11, interpreted where appropriate in the light of Article 10 (see Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 363-65, 7 February 2017). - EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 75734/12
RAZVOZZHAYEV v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE AND UDALTSOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 25809/17
Nothing suggests that he had shown any violent intentions or had called on the participants to engage in the acts of aggression (see, a contrario, Razvozzhayev v. Russia and Ukraine and Udaltsov v. Russia, nos. 75734/12 and 2 others, § 284, 19 November 2019). - EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 25809/17
The courts justified his arrest and conviction by the mere reference to the "unlawfulness" of the march, without assessing whether it had been possible to ensure that the march proceed peacefully while minimising the disruption of movement of passers-by, road users and public service workers (see, mutatis mutandis, Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, § 60, 15 October 2015).
- EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 51766/21
RYAKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. - VerfGH Nordrhein-Westfalen, 15.12.2020 - VerfGH 12/20
Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen gerichtliche Entscheidungen im Zusammenhang mit einem …
Im Rahmen eines gegen ihn gerichteten Zwangsvollstreckungsverfahrens wegen einer Forderung in Höhe von 113,- EUR beantragte der Beschwerdeführer am 8. März 2018 Einsicht in die Sonderakte DR II 247/18 der zuständigen Gerichtsvollzieherin.Am 8. Januar 2019, der Beschwerdeführer hatte bis dahin weder selbst Einsicht in die Sonderakte DR II 247/18 nehmen können noch Ablichtungen daraus erhalten, stand in dem Zwangsvollstreckungsverfahren ein Termin zur Abgabe der Vermögensauskunft an, den der Beschwerdeführer nicht wahrnahm.
Das Landgericht übersandte die Ablichtungen aus der Sonderakte DR II 247/18 schließlich mit Schreiben vom 27. August 2019.
Er sieht sich durch die Beschlüsse des Landgerichts vom 8. November 2019 und vom 2. Januar 2020 in seinem Anspruch auf rechtliches Gehör aus Art. 4 Abs. 1 LV i. V. m. Art. 103 Abs. 1 GG verletzt, weil das Landgericht die beigezogenen Sonderakten DR II 247/18 und DR II 264/19 der Gerichtsvollzieherin bei der Entscheidungsfindung berücksichtigt habe, ohne ihm in ausreichender Form Gelegenheit zur Stellungnahme zum Akteninhalt zu geben.
- EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 4604/17
DMITRIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 16. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
- EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 40133/21
PAPULIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 18. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. - EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 21782/21
ZHUKOVETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. - EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 38346/21
VASIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. - EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 1097/18
CHIRKUNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. - EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 24722/18
SLIVIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. - EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 35579/21
KINZHABAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. - EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 8417/23
ZAYTSEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 14. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. - EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 44147/21
POGORELOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 53913/15
BORISOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 50067/18
BORODIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 47784/18
ZINCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 16047/21
SKOROKHODOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 41806/21
KAMENTSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 2097/22
SOKOLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 38671/21
PEREVOZCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 2523/21
PETROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 25187/15
LUTSEVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 71114/17
OLSHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 40064/21
MAMONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 43191/21
KIRSANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 44630/21
KOROLKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 46570/18
NURUSHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 13038/18
SKOBELEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 32180/21
YELYSHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 52365/22
VAKULKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 39222/21
PROGUNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 63772/17
BUKHTENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 33196/22
ABROSIMOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 31649/22
STRELETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 13238/21
DANKOVSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 28133/21
KULVINSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 46694/21
BOROVKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 40486/21
PANKRATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 57580/21
SOLOVYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 54089/21
LEVKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 25863/21
ILYIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 33633/21
GUSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 54470/21
IVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 55480/21
PETROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 32174/21
YAKHNOVETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 9429/23
SARIMOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 47048/21
MAKSIMOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 48029/21
YERMOLAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 45205/22
ATAMANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 51373/21
USTINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 38070/21
SKOROKHODOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 57518/22
BOBROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 28538/21
BIREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 49997/21
KANYGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 57870/21
GENERALOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 25870/21
GRYAZEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 884/22
PANTENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 43487/21
MOLCHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 43566/21
GORODNICHEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 43655/21
PULUDI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 52077/22
NAZAREDSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 44292/18
FROLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 43267/21
SAVCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 44105/21
DORONIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 50116/18
ABAKUMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 15326/19
SARANCHUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 44850/18
KIRPICHEV (KIRPICHENKO) AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 23169/18
VARACHENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 2825/21
STALIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 51074/21
AZIZOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 984/15
MAZUROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 41853/21
NADAREYSHVILI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 24326/18
KUSHTAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 51391/21
TARASENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 2838/22
BORIS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 16001/17
KAPITONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 54923/21
GALIMULLIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 75231/17
YURGILEVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 14839/21
BAKHMATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 2829/18
BOYARSHINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 13679/18
NIKOLENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 78796/17
GORSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA