Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JANSSEN DE JONG GROEP B.V. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for home;Respect for private life);No violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  JANSSEN DE JONG GROEP B.V. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 30.03.2023 - C-162/22

  Lietuvos Respublikos generaline prokuratura

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2023 - 2800/16

  See also the opinion of Advocate-General Campos Sanchez-Bordona delivered on 30 March 2023 in Lietuvos Respublikos generaline prokurat?«ra (Case C-162/22, ECLI:EU:C:2023:266), currently pending before the CJEU (concerning a request for a preliminary ruling as to whether personal data obtained in a criminal investigation may subsequently be used in "linked" disciplinary proceedings of an administrative nature against a public official).
• EuGH, 02.03.2021 - C-746/18

  Grenzen für Vorratsdatenspeicherung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2023 - 2800/16

  [4] See, mutatis mutandis, the judgment of the CJEU of 2 March 2021 in H.K. (C-746/18, ECLI:EU:C:2021:152), addressing, inter alia, the question as to whether the Estonian public prosecutor's office could be regarded as an independent administrative authority capable of authorising access of the investigating authority to data relating to electronic communications.
• EuGH, 02.03.2023 - C-268/21

  Norra Stockholm Bygg

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2023 - 2800/16

  [1] See, mutatis mutandis, the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 2 March 2023 in Norra Stockholm Bygg AB (C-268/21, ECLI:EU:C:2023:145), involving a private contractual dispute in which the claimant sought to obtain the staff register data of the defendant company (held for tax-law purposes), which included staff's personal data.

 
• EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71

  Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2023 - 2800/16

  As to the requirement of the law's "foreseeability", the Court has accepted on different occasions that investigative methods may have to be used covertly (see, for example and amongst many other authorities, Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 48, Series A no. 28).
• EGMR, 07.06.2016 - 30083/10

  KARABEYOGLU c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2023 - 2800/16

  It further notes that the transmission of data obtained through the interception of telecommunications to and their use by other authorities may constitute a separate interference with rights protected by this provision (see Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, § 79, ECHR 2006-XI, with further references; see also Karabeyoglu v. Turkey, no. 30083/10, §§ 112-21, 17 June 2016).
• EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 24117/08

  BERNH LARSEN HOLDING AS AND OTHERS v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2023 - 2800/16

  The Court reiterates that legal persons may, under certain circumstances, claim rights to respect of their business premises and correspondence under Article 8 (see, inter alia, Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, § 46, 23 June 2022, and Bernh Larsen Holding AS and Others v. Norway, no. 24117/08, §§ 105-06, 14 March 2013).
• EGMR, 04.12.2015 - 47143/06

  EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen geheimer Telefonüberwachung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2023 - 2800/16

  It is therefore essential to have clear, detailed rules on secret surveillance measures, that are sufficiently clear in its terms to give individuals an adequate indication as to the circumstances in which and the conditions on which public authorities are empowered to resort to any such measures (see Dragojevic, cited above, § 81; Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, § 229, ECHR 2015; and Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 58170/13 and 2 others, § 333, 25 May 2021).
• EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 54934/00

  Menschenrechte: Verletzung der Privatsphäre und des Briefgeheimnisses durch das …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2023 - 2800/16

  It further notes that the transmission of data obtained through the interception of telecommunications to and their use by other authorities may constitute a separate interference with rights protected by this provision (see Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, § 79, ECHR 2006-XI, with further references; see also Karabeyoglu v. Turkey, no. 30083/10, §§ 112-21, 17 June 2016).
• EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 50805/14

  NAUMENKO AND SIA RIX SHIPPING v. LATVIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2023 - 2800/16

  The Court reiterates that legal persons may, under certain circumstances, claim rights to respect of their business premises and correspondence under Article 8 (see, inter alia, Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, § 46, 23 June 2022, and Bernh Larsen Holding AS and Others v. Norway, no. 24117/08, §§ 105-06, 14 March 2013).

• LSG Berlin-Brandenburg, 27.07.2023 - L 10 AS 311/19

  Unionsbürger - Leistungsausschluss unter SGB II und SGB XII - faktischer Inländer …

  Der Kläger habe in dem bezeichneten Zeitraum keinen Anspruch gegen den dortigen Beklagten, weil er von Leistungen nach § 7 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Nr. 2 SGB II ausgeschlossen gewesen sei, weil er sich in diesem Zeitraum ausschließlich zum Zwecke der Arbeitssuche in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland aufgehalten habe, es stehe ihm insbesondere auch kein Aufenthaltsrecht als faktischer Inländer nach Art. 8 der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention (EMRK) zu, weil das dafür erforderliche hohe Maß an Integration beim Kläger nicht als gegeben erachtet werde (Bezugnahme auf den zwischen dem Kläger und dem dortigen Beklagten ergangenen Beschluss des 31. Senats des Landessozialgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg vom 05. Januar 2017 - L 31 AS 2800/16 B ER).