Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.11.2022 - 29417/17 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,32181) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MALAGIC v. CROATIA
No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00
MIFSUD contre la FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2022 - 29417/17
The purpose of Article 35 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, for example, Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII). - EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02
Opuz ./. Türkei
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2022 - 29417/17
The Court has also stressed on numerous occasions that States have a positive obligation to establish and apply effectively a system punishing all forms of domestic violence and to provide sufficient safeguards for the victims (see Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 145, ECHR 2009, and Bal?Ÿan v. Romania, no. 49645/09, § 57, 23 May 2017). - EGMR, 23.05.2017 - 49645/09
BALSAN v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2022 - 29417/17
The Court has also stressed on numerous occasions that States have a positive obligation to establish and apply effectively a system punishing all forms of domestic violence and to provide sufficient safeguards for the victims (see Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 145, ECHR 2009, and Bal?Ÿan v. Romania, no. 49645/09, § 57, 23 May 2017).