Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BELUGIN v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BELUGIN v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 34, Art. 35 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (15)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2019 - 2991/06

  While Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, this being primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 94, ECHR 2006-IX, and Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 162, ECHR 2010).
• EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 2257/12

  ZADUMOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2019 - 2991/06

  Having regard to the fact that domestic law provides that criminal proceedings may be reopened if the Court finds a violation of the Convention, and given the position of the Russian Supreme Court, the Court considers that the finding of a violation constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicant (see Zadumov v. Russia, no. 2257/12, §§ 80-81, 12 December 2017, and most recently, Kumitskiy and Others v. Russia, nos. 66215/12 and 4 others, § 28, 10 July 2018).
• EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 66215/12

  KUMITSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2019 - 2991/06

  Having regard to the fact that domestic law provides that criminal proceedings may be reopened if the Court finds a violation of the Convention, and given the position of the Russian Supreme Court, the Court considers that the finding of a violation constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicant (see Zadumov v. Russia, no. 2257/12, §§ 80-81, 12 December 2017, and most recently, Kumitskiy and Others v. Russia, nos. 66215/12 and 4 others, § 28, 10 July 2018).

• EGMR, 05.07.2022 - 50942/08

  IVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  7077/06 and 12 others, §§ 78-79, 26 June 2018; and Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, §§ 69-71, 26 November 2019).

  Domestic courts failed to conduct a comprehensive review of his credible allegations in that regard (see Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, § 71, 26 November 2019).

  Domestic courts failed to conduct a comprehensive review of his credible allegations in that regard (see Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, § 71, 26 November 2019).

• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 41071/18

  TINGAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  45044/06 and 5 others, §§ 111-12, 12 December 2017, Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015, Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, § 70, 26 November 2019, Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 13-14 and 54, 28 November 2017, Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia, nos.

  The statements of confession obtained as a result of ill-treatment in breach of Article 3 were used as evidence so as to establish the relevant facts in the criminal proceedings - it rendered the proceedings, as a whole, unfair (Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, § 70, 26 November 2019).

• EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 15380/19

  TARASOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  45044/06 and 5 others, §§ 111-12, 12 December 2017, and Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, §§ 69-83, 6 November 2019.

  2991/06, §§ 69-83,.

 
• EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09

  MASLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  45044/06 and 5 others, §§ 111-12, 12 December 2017, Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015, Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, § 70, 26 November 2019, Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 13-14 and 54, 28 November 2017, Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 25.11.2021 - 10917/15

  SASSI ET BENCHELLALI c. FRANCE

  En particulier, la Cour examinera si les juridictions internes ont répondu de manière adéquate aux objections soulevées par les requérants quant à la fiabilité et à la valeur probante de leurs déclarations et leur ont donné une possibilité effective de contester leur recevabilité et de s'opposer effectivement à leur utilisation (voir, mutatis mutandis, Belugin c. Russie, no 2991/06, § 74 et suivants, 26 novembre 2019, et El Haski, précité, § 90).

  En ce qui concerne l'équité de la procédure pénale, je partage l'opinion de mes collègues ; la Cour doit examiner si les juridictions internes ont répondu de manière adéquate aux objections soulevées par les requérants quant à la fiabilité et à la valeur probante de leurs déclarations et si elles leur ont donné une possibilité effective de contester leur recevabilité et de s'opposer effectivement à leur utilisation (voir le paragraphe 93 du présent arrêt, qui se réfère à Belugin c. Russie, no 2991/06, § 74, 26 novembre 2019).

• EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 40311/19

  MUZHETSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  45044/06 and 5 others, §§ 111-12, 12 December 2017, Tangiyev v. Russia, no. 27610/05, § 76, 11 December 2012, and Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, §§ 69-71, 26 November 2019.
• EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 75045/11

  PUGACHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  45044/06 and 5 others, §§ 111-12, 12 December 2017; Tangiyev v. Russia, no. 27610/05, § 76, 11 December 2012; and Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, §§ 69-71, 26 November 2019.
• EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 15476/08

  FREDRIKSEN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court concludes that the domestic courts failed to carry out an independent and comprehensive review of the applicants' credible allegations that their self-incriminating statements had been the result of police violence (see Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, § 81, 26 November 2019), and that the use of the applicants' confessions obtained as a result of torture, regardless of their impact on the outcome of the criminal proceedings, rendered the applicants' trials unfair.
• EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 18032/19

  BARONIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  45044/06 and 5 others, §§ 111-12, 12 December 2017, Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015, Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 53-56, 28 November 2017, Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, §§ 69-71, 26 November 2019, Fortalnov and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 17912/15

  KUTAYEV v. RUSSIA

  The Court's assessment 108. The Court reiterates that the admission of confession obtained in violation of Article 3 of the Convention renders the associated criminal proceedings as a whole automatically unfair, irrespective of the probative value of those statements and irrespective of whether their use was decisive in securing the defendant's conviction (see Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 166, ECHR 2010; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015; and Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, §§ 69-71, 26 November 2019).
• EGMR, 03.10.2023 - 39272/15

  REPESCO ET REPESCU c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 19498/11

  IDRISOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.01.2021 - 40321/07

  FARIZ AHMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 4261/06

  KUDAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.05.2022 - 43387/09

  STROGOV AND KIRICHENKO v. RUSSIA