Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 30464/13, 19068/14   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2022,15920
EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 30464/13, 19068/14 (https://dejure.org/2022,15920)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07.06.2022 - 30464/13, 19068/14 (https://dejure.org/2022,15920)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07. Juni 2022 - 30464/13, 19068/14 (https://dejure.org/2022,15920)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,15920) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

  • EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86

    LETELLIER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 30464/13
    It is true that under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention it is in the first place for the national judicial authorities to review all considerations for or against detention and set them out in their decisions (see, among other authorities, Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, § 35, Series A no. 207; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 152, ECHR 2000-IV; and McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 43, ECHR 2006-X).
  • EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03

    IDALOV c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 30464/13
    Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are actual indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty laid down in Article 5 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 110 et seq., ECHR 2000-XI, and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 139, 22 May 2012).
  • EGMR, 05.11.2009 - 29044/06

    SHABANI c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 30464/13
    In these circumstances, despite the relatively lengthy period of the applicant's pre-trial detention, the Court concludes that his right to have his cases examined with particular expedition could not unduly hinder the domestic authorities' conscientious efforts to carry out their investigative tasks with proper care (compare, among other authorities, Sadegül Özdemir v. Turkey, no. 61441/00, § 44, 2 August 2005, and Shabani v. Switzerland, no. 29044/06, § 65, 5 November 2009).
  • EGMR, 18.07.2019 - 16812/17

    RUSTAVI 2 BROADCASTING COMPANY LTD AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 30464/13
    However, where no arguable issue, or no interference with the applicant's rights, under the relevant substantive provision has been established, Article 18 cannot be relied upon (see Rustavi 2 Broadcasting Company Ltd and Others v. Georgia, no. 16812/17, §§ 316-17, 18 July 2019).
  • EGMR, 10.10.2019 - 8284/07

    BATIASHVILI v. GEORGIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 30464/13
    Furthermore, the investigations in all four criminal cases were complex tasks for the domestic authorities, owing, among other considerations, to the passage of time between the occurrence of the acts in issue and the start of the investigation, the large number of witnesses and co-accused to be examined in each case and the difficulties inherent in the prosecution of criminal offences allegedly committed by high-ranking officials, which the applicant was at the time (compare, mutatis mutandis, Batiashvili v. Georgia, no. 8284/07, §§ 58-59, 10 October 2019).
  • EGMR, 02.04.2020 - 8938/07

    KUKHALASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 30464/13
    The case concerned the applicant's personal role in the torture and ill-treatment of prisoners and violent suppression of a prison riot that had taken place in March 2006 and as a result of which seven inmates had been killed and twenty-two others seriously injured by law-enforcement agents (for more details, see Kukhalashvili and Others v. Georgia, nos. 8938/07 and 41891/07, §§ 8-92, 2 April 2020).
  • EGMR, 26.04.2011 - 25091/07

    ENUKIDZE AND GIRGVLIANI v. GEORGIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 30464/13
    The constitutive elements of the alleged offence consisted in the applicant unlawfully granting privileges, at the time when he had held the post of the Head of the Prisons Department of the Ministry of Justice between December 2005 and December 2008, to four inmates who had been detained in prison no. 10 in relation to a murder case in which the applicant's brother had allegedly also been involved (for more details about the murder case, see Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, §§ 129-30, 26 April 2011).
  • EGMR, 22.10.2018 - 35553/12

    Urteil bestätigt Präventivhaft: EGMR lässt Polizei Spielraum im Umgang mit

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 30464/13
    It is, moreover, clear from the case-law that the notion of arbitrariness in the context of Article 5 varies to a certain extent depending on the type of detention involved (see S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, § 75, 22 October 2018).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht